<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Amazon Isn&#8217;t Liable for Defective Marketplace Sale (No Thanks to Section 230)&#8211;Erie Insurance v. Amazon	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/05/amazon-isnt-liable-for-defective-marketplace-sale-no-thanks-to-section-230-erie-insurance-v-amazon.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/05/amazon-isnt-liable-for-defective-marketplace-sale-no-thanks-to-section-230-erie-insurance-v-amazon.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2019 20:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: John_Levine		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/05/amazon-isnt-liable-for-defective-marketplace-sale-no-thanks-to-section-230-erie-insurance-v-amazon.htm#comment-2300</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John_Levine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2019 20:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=20038#comment-2300</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know whether it happened in this case, but Amazon commingles inventory from different sellers. If you order an item from an Amazon seller, and a second seller has the same item at a closer warehouse, they&#039;ll ship the second seller&#039;s item. This is a huge problem because a lot of those second sellers have counterfeit products, and the first seller who had the real product gets blamed.
Would that change the analysis? Nominally the inventory belongs to the two sellers, but if Amazon can substitute them without asking, who really owns it?
Fraud problem described &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.inc.com/sonya-mann/amazon-counterfeits-no-starch.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, Amazon&#039;s weak response &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.wired.com/story/amazon-fake-products-project-zero/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know whether it happened in this case, but Amazon commingles inventory from different sellers. If you order an item from an Amazon seller, and a second seller has the same item at a closer warehouse, they&#8217;ll ship the second seller&#8217;s item. This is a huge problem because a lot of those second sellers have counterfeit products, and the first seller who had the real product gets blamed.<br />
Would that change the analysis? Nominally the inventory belongs to the two sellers, but if Amazon can substitute them without asking, who really owns it?<br />
Fraud problem described <a href="https://www.inc.com/sonya-mann/amazon-counterfeits-no-starch.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>, Amazon&#8217;s weak response <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/amazon-fake-products-project-zero/" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
