https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/04/photographer-sues-for-failure-to-provide-creative-commons-required-attribution-philpot-v-wos.htm Tue, 30 Apr 2019 20:18:00 +0000 hourly 1 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/04/photographer-sues-for-failure-to-provide-creative-commons-required-attribution-philpot-v-wos.htm#comment-2290 Tue, 30 Apr 2019 20:18:00 +0000 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=19923#comment-2290 Additionally, I don’t believe that attorneys’ fees count as costs recoverable under FRCP 68. I believe Rule 68 costs are limited to the same sort of costs that are recoverable by a prevailing party under FRCP 64, i.e., copy costs, transcription fees, etc. Usually those costs are a small percentage of overall litigation costs.

]]> https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/04/photographer-sues-for-failure-to-provide-creative-commons-required-attribution-philpot-v-wos.htm#comment-2288 Fri, 26 Apr 2019 14:04:00 +0000 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=19923#comment-2288 Interesting. In patent-infringement cases, attorneys’ fees can only go to a “prevailing party” and a party cannot be a prevailing party if it lost on the merits, even if it “won” on damages by limiting damages to a nominal amount.

]]>