<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Court Says California&#8217;s Anti-Spam Statute Doesn&#8217;t Regulate Affiliate Networks&#8211;Bank v. Hydra	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/04/court-says-californias-anti-spam-statute-doesnt-regulate-affiliate-networks-bank-v-hydra.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/04/court-says-californias-anti-spam-statute-doesnt-regulate-affiliate-networks-bank-v-hydra.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 22:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Anne P. Mitchell		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/04/court-says-californias-anti-spam-statute-doesnt-regulate-affiliate-networks-bank-v-hydra.htm#comment-2279</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anne P. Mitchell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 22:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=19858#comment-2279</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This was a terrible test case, and the lawyer who represented himself did himself and the community a disservice. :~( Thank goodness it was only a bench trial, with no precedential weight.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a terrible test case, and the lawyer who represented himself did himself and the community a disservice. :~( Thank goodness it was only a bench trial, with no precedential weight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
