<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Another Appellate Court Rejects &#8220;Material Support for Terrorist&#8221; Claims Against Social Media Platforms&#8211;Crosby v. Twitter	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/04/another-appellate-court-rejects-material-support-for-terrorist-claims-against-social-media-platforms-crosby-v-twitter.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/04/another-appellate-court-rejects-material-support-for-terrorist-claims-against-social-media-platforms-crosby-v-twitter.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2019 14:09:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: CLIP-ings: April 19, 2019 &#8211; CLIP-ings		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/04/another-appellate-court-rejects-material-support-for-terrorist-claims-against-social-media-platforms-crosby-v-twitter.htm#comment-2287</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CLIP-ings: April 19, 2019 &#8211; CLIP-ings]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2019 14:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=19891#comment-2287</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Another Anti-Terrorism Act Suit Against Tech Giants Fails: The Sixth Circuit affirmed dismissal of a suit alleging that Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube’s poor self-policing afforded the perpetrator of the Pulse Nightclub shooting encouragement and assistance from ISIS in violation of the Anti-Terrorism Act; the court affirmed the District Court’s finding that the social media sites’ conduct did not proximately cause the shooting. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Another Anti-Terrorism Act Suit Against Tech Giants Fails: The Sixth Circuit affirmed dismissal of a suit alleging that Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube’s poor self-policing afforded the perpetrator of the Pulse Nightclub shooting encouragement and assistance from ISIS in violation of the Anti-Terrorism Act; the court affirmed the District Court’s finding that the social media sites’ conduct did not proximately cause the shooting. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eleventh Lawsuit Against Social Media Providers for &#34;Materially Supporting Terrorists&#34; Fails-Palmucci v. Twitter - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/04/another-appellate-court-rejects-material-support-for-terrorist-claims-against-social-media-platforms-crosby-v-twitter.htm#comment-2286</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eleventh Lawsuit Against Social Media Providers for &#34;Materially Supporting Terrorists&#34; Fails-Palmucci v. Twitter - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2019 13:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=19891#comment-2286</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] * Another Appellate Court Rejects “Material Support for Terrorist” Claims Against Social Media Pla&#8230; * Tenth Lawsuit Against Social Media Providers for “Materially Supporting Terrorists” Fails–Sinclair v. Twitter * Ninth Lawsuit Against Social Media Providers for “Materially Supporting Terrorists” Fails–Clayborn v. Twitter * Eighth Lawsuit Against Social Media Providers for “Materially Supporting Terrorists” Fails–Copeland v. Twitter * Seventh Different Lawsuit Against Social Media Providers for “Material Support to Terrorists” Fails–Taamneh v. Twitter * Another Social Media “Material Support to Terrorists” Lawsuit Fails–Cain v. Twitter * “Material Support for Terrorists” Lawsuit Against YouTube Fails Again–Gonzalez v. Google * Fifth Court Rejects ‘Material Support for Terrorism’ Claims Against Social Media Sites–Crosby v. Twitter * Twitter Didn’t Cause ISIS-Inspired Terrorism–Fields v. Twitter * Section 230 Again Preempts Suit Against Facebook for Supporting Terrorists–Force v. Facebook * Fourth Judge Says Social Media Sites Aren’t Liable for Supporting Terrorists–Pennie v. Twitter * Another Court Rejects ‘Material Support To Terrorists’ Claims Against Social Media Sites–Gonzalez v. Google * Facebook Defeats Lawsuit Over Material Support for Terrorists–Cohen v. Facebook * Twitter Defeats ISIS “Material Support” Lawsuit Again–Fields v. Twitter * Section 230 Immunizes Twitter From Liability For ISIS’s Terrorist Activities–Fields v. Twitter [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] * Another Appellate Court Rejects “Material Support for Terrorist” Claims Against Social Media Pla&#8230; * Tenth Lawsuit Against Social Media Providers for “Materially Supporting Terrorists” Fails–Sinclair v. Twitter * Ninth Lawsuit Against Social Media Providers for “Materially Supporting Terrorists” Fails–Clayborn v. Twitter * Eighth Lawsuit Against Social Media Providers for “Materially Supporting Terrorists” Fails–Copeland v. Twitter * Seventh Different Lawsuit Against Social Media Providers for “Material Support to Terrorists” Fails–Taamneh v. Twitter * Another Social Media “Material Support to Terrorists” Lawsuit Fails–Cain v. Twitter * “Material Support for Terrorists” Lawsuit Against YouTube Fails Again–Gonzalez v. Google * Fifth Court Rejects ‘Material Support for Terrorism’ Claims Against Social Media Sites–Crosby v. Twitter * Twitter Didn’t Cause ISIS-Inspired Terrorism–Fields v. Twitter * Section 230 Again Preempts Suit Against Facebook for Supporting Terrorists–Force v. Facebook * Fourth Judge Says Social Media Sites Aren’t Liable for Supporting Terrorists–Pennie v. Twitter * Another Court Rejects ‘Material Support To Terrorists’ Claims Against Social Media Sites–Gonzalez v. Google * Facebook Defeats Lawsuit Over Material Support for Terrorists–Cohen v. Facebook * Twitter Defeats ISIS “Material Support” Lawsuit Again–Fields v. Twitter * Section 230 Immunizes Twitter From Liability For ISIS’s Terrorist Activities–Fields v. Twitter [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
