<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Section 230 Preempts Unfair Competition Law Claim&#8211;Taylor v. Twitter	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/03/section-230-preempts-unfair-competition-law-claim-taylor-v-twitter.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/03/section-230-preempts-unfair-competition-law-claim-taylor-v-twitter.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2019 15:18:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Court Tosses Antitrust Claims That Internet Giants Are Biased Against Conservatives-Freedom Watch v. Google - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/03/section-230-preempts-unfair-competition-law-claim-taylor-v-twitter.htm#comment-2247</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Court Tosses Antitrust Claims That Internet Giants Are Biased Against Conservatives-Freedom Watch v. Google - Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2019 15:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=19755#comment-2247</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] * Section 230 Preempts Unfair Competition Law Claim–Taylor v. Twitter * Twitter Defeats Yet Another Lawsuit from a Suspended User–Cox v. Twitter * Twitter’s TOS Upheld Despite Unilateral Amendment Clause—Brittain v. Twitter * Another Suspended Twitter User Loses in Court–Kimbrell v. Twitter * Comments on Trump’s Empty Tweetstorm Threatening Social Media Providers * Section 230 Protects Twitter’s Decision to Suspend User’s Account–Mezey v. Twitter * Twitter Gets Powerful Win in “Must-Carry” Lawsuit–Taylor v. Twitter * YouTube Isn’t a Company Town (Duh)–Prager University v. Google * Facebook Defeats Lawsuit By User Suspended Over ‘Bowling Green Massacre’–Shulman v. Facebook * Facebook Not Liable for Account Termination–Young v. Facebook * Online Game Network Isn’t Company Town–Estavillo v. Sony [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] * Section 230 Preempts Unfair Competition Law Claim–Taylor v. Twitter * Twitter Defeats Yet Another Lawsuit from a Suspended User–Cox v. Twitter * Twitter’s TOS Upheld Despite Unilateral Amendment Clause—Brittain v. Twitter * Another Suspended Twitter User Loses in Court–Kimbrell v. Twitter * Comments on Trump’s Empty Tweetstorm Threatening Social Media Providers * Section 230 Protects Twitter’s Decision to Suspend User’s Account–Mezey v. Twitter * Twitter Gets Powerful Win in “Must-Carry” Lawsuit–Taylor v. Twitter * YouTube Isn’t a Company Town (Duh)–Prager University v. Google * Facebook Defeats Lawsuit By User Suspended Over ‘Bowling Green Massacre’–Shulman v. Facebook * Facebook Not Liable for Account Termination–Young v. Facebook * Online Game Network Isn’t Company Town–Estavillo v. Sony [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
