Comments on: Twitter’s TOS Upheld Despite Unilateral Amendment Clause—Brittain v. Twitter https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/01/twitters-tos-upheld-despite-unilateral-amendment-clause-brittain-v-twitter.htm Fri, 18 Jan 2019 14:19:47 +0000 hourly 1 By: CLIP-ings: January 18, 2019 – CLIP-ings https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/01/twitters-tos-upheld-despite-unilateral-amendment-clause-brittain-v-twitter.htm#comment-2220 Fri, 18 Jan 2019 14:19:47 +0000 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=19572#comment-2220 […] Court Upholds Twitter’s Unilateral Amendment Clause: An Arizona District Judge rejected a plaintiff’s attempt to invalidate the forum selection clause in Twitter’s terms of service on the basis that the terms allowed for unilateral modification by Twitter; the court noted that Twitter’s terms did not allow retroactive modification and met the requirements for mutuality of obligations. […]

]]> By: Eric Goldman https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/01/twitters-tos-upheld-despite-unilateral-amendment-clause-brittain-v-twitter.htm#comment-2216 Sat, 12 Jan 2019 17:43:00 +0000 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=19572#comment-2216 In reply to Erica Bristol.

I teach Harris v. Blockbuster. Douglas v. Talk America is the leading Ninth Circuit case. Rodman v. Safeway is also significant.

]]> By: Erica Bristol https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/01/twitters-tos-upheld-despite-unilateral-amendment-clause-brittain-v-twitter.htm#comment-2215 Sat, 12 Jan 2019 17:28:00 +0000 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=19572#comment-2215 Eric, can you suggest significant cases for unilateral TOU amendments besides Zappos (perhaps in CA/9th circuit)?

]]>