Comments on: Section 230 Doesn’t Support Habeus Petition by ‘Revenge’ Pornographer–Bollaert v. Gore https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/11/section-230-doesnt-support-habeus-petition-by-revenge-pornographer-bollaert-v-gore.htm Wed, 07 Nov 2018 18:47:00 +0000 hourly 1 By: Bill Silverstein https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/11/section-230-doesnt-support-habeus-petition-by-revenge-pornographer-bollaert-v-gore.htm#comment-2186 Wed, 07 Nov 2018 18:47:00 +0000 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=19345#comment-2186 In reply to big_dman.

What you described might be extortion, but that is not what is happening. It is someone posted your naked photos on their own, but I will charge you to remove them.

]]> By: big_dman https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/11/section-230-doesnt-support-habeus-petition-by-revenge-pornographer-bollaert-v-gore.htm#comment-2185 Tue, 06 Nov 2018 20:52:00 +0000 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=19345#comment-2185 Can you elborate on this?

“Pay-to-remove sites are not inherently extortive . . . .”

“I’ll publish naked photos of you unless you give me money,” is a prototypical blackmail scheme.

]]>