<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: A Privacy Bomb Is About to Be Dropped on the California Economy and the Global Internet	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/06/a-privacy-bomb-is-about-to-be-dropped-on-the-california-economy-and-the-global-internet.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/06/a-privacy-bomb-is-about-to-be-dropped-on-the-california-economy-and-the-global-internet.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 13:25:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Eric Goldman		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/06/a-privacy-bomb-is-about-to-be-dropped-on-the-california-economy-and-the-global-internet.htm#comment-2135</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Goldman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2018 23:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=18933#comment-2135</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/06/a-privacy-bomb-is-about-to-be-dropped-on-the-california-economy-and-the-global-internet.htm#comment-2134&quot;&gt;Jim Blair&lt;/a&gt;.

I doubt the law applies to government or non-profit educational institutions. The definition of &quot;business&quot; is &quot;A sole proprietorship, partnership, limited liability company, corporation, association, or other legal entity that is organized or operated for the profit or financial benefit of its shareholders or other owners&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/06/a-privacy-bomb-is-about-to-be-dropped-on-the-california-economy-and-the-global-internet.htm#comment-2134">Jim Blair</a>.</p>
<p>I doubt the law applies to government or non-profit educational institutions. The definition of &#8220;business&#8221; is &#8220;A sole proprietorship, partnership, limited liability company, corporation, association, or other legal entity that is organized or operated for the profit or financial benefit of its shareholders or other owners&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim Blair		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/06/a-privacy-bomb-is-about-to-be-dropped-on-the-california-economy-and-the-global-internet.htm#comment-2134</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Blair]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2018 23:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=18933#comment-2134</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Eric - Can you confirm whether the law applies to the major universities and school districts in and offering services in California?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric &#8211; Can you confirm whether the law applies to the major universities and school districts in and offering services in California?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John Cuyle		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/06/a-privacy-bomb-is-about-to-be-dropped-on-the-california-economy-and-the-global-internet.htm#comment-2128</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Cuyle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2018 00:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=18933#comment-2128</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I take issue with this sentence:  However, it’s well-known in privacy circles that the distinction between “personally identifiable” and “non-personally identifiable” information is incoherent and nonsensical. 

Here&#039;s an example of personally identifiable information:  Your name and address.

Here&#039;s an example of non-personally identifiable information (longer, because this sort of data tends to be more esoteric):  You&#039;re playing the video game Halo.  While playing, data such as which weapon you use, where on the map you use it, when and where on the map you shoot, and whether you score a kill is all collected.  This information is not associated with you in particular, it is aggregated with similar information from every other player who also plays Halo.  Since the data is not associated with any single player and is an aggregation of lots of data points across lots of players, and there&#039;s no way to map any particular point of data back to any particular person, this is clearly not personally identifiable information.  This sort of data is used to generate heat maps which indicate which weapons are used how often on particular maps and what success rates to help the developer tune the damage values of the different weapons and their locations on the map to improve gameplay, so it certainly has value, but not in the &quot;selling your info to advertisers&quot; sense.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take issue with this sentence:  However, it’s well-known in privacy circles that the distinction between “personally identifiable” and “non-personally identifiable” information is incoherent and nonsensical. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an example of personally identifiable information:  Your name and address.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an example of non-personally identifiable information (longer, because this sort of data tends to be more esoteric):  You&#8217;re playing the video game Halo.  While playing, data such as which weapon you use, where on the map you use it, when and where on the map you shoot, and whether you score a kill is all collected.  This information is not associated with you in particular, it is aggregated with similar information from every other player who also plays Halo.  Since the data is not associated with any single player and is an aggregation of lots of data points across lots of players, and there&#8217;s no way to map any particular point of data back to any particular person, this is clearly not personally identifiable information.  This sort of data is used to generate heat maps which indicate which weapons are used how often on particular maps and what success rates to help the developer tune the damage values of the different weapons and their locations on the map to improve gameplay, so it certainly has value, but not in the &#8220;selling your info to advertisers&#8221; sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jeremy Washington		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/06/a-privacy-bomb-is-about-to-be-dropped-on-the-california-economy-and-the-global-internet.htm#comment-2127</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Washington]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2018 21:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=18933#comment-2127</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Though I agree that the details are off, and that it is hasty - I&#039;m still glad to see any move towards data protection. I really think the solution is in private protocols rather than government legislation, however. Interesting to see this company going after a solution: https://www.jlinc.org/ab-375-solution/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though I agree that the details are off, and that it is hasty &#8211; I&#8217;m still glad to see any move towards data protection. I really think the solution is in private protocols rather than government legislation, however. Interesting to see this company going after a solution: <a href="https://www.jlinc.org/ab-375-solution/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.jlinc.org/ab-375-solution/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: California’s privacy-law bomb &#8211; John Culbreath		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/06/a-privacy-bomb-is-about-to-be-dropped-on-the-california-economy-and-the-global-internet.htm#comment-2126</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[California’s privacy-law bomb &#8211; John Culbreath]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2018 18:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=18933#comment-2126</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Eric Goldman, “A Privacy Bomb Is About to Be Dropped on the California Economy and the Global Internet”: [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Eric Goldman, “A Privacy Bomb Is About to Be Dropped on the California Economy and the Global Internet”: [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Randy Wilson		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/06/a-privacy-bomb-is-about-to-be-dropped-on-the-california-economy-and-the-global-internet.htm#comment-2124</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randy Wilson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2018 04:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=18933#comment-2124</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the insightful post Eric.  Where to begin... I wasn&#039;t in favor of the initiative but I thought a statewide discussion on data protection would have been useful.  Sure the usual distortions and fear-mongering would have ensued but some public discourse is better than none.  But this is a mockery of the legislative process foisted on us by our ridiculous initiative system. This very consequential law was passed as you point out far too hastily and without any public hearings. I called and emailed Jerry Brown which did no good at all and had he vetoed the bill, its unanimous passage suggests his effort like mine would have been pointless.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the insightful post Eric.  Where to begin&#8230; I wasn&#8217;t in favor of the initiative but I thought a statewide discussion on data protection would have been useful.  Sure the usual distortions and fear-mongering would have ensued but some public discourse is better than none.  But this is a mockery of the legislative process foisted on us by our ridiculous initiative system. This very consequential law was passed as you point out far too hastily and without any public hearings. I called and emailed Jerry Brown which did no good at all and had he vetoed the bill, its unanimous passage suggests his effort like mine would have been pointless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Prattle On, Boyo		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/06/a-privacy-bomb-is-about-to-be-dropped-on-the-california-economy-and-the-global-internet.htm#comment-2123</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prattle On, Boyo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 21:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=18933#comment-2123</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So the writer of this piece wants to remove ballot propositions because he doesn&#039;t like that the voters of this state actually have a say in what they want versus what the schizo State Assembly wants?  I call BS.  Citing the fact that most props are backed up by millionaires with &quot;pet projects&quot; is not a reason primarily because that particular group has no chance of being removed from the equation in the first place.  Well, not unless the state nullifies corporate money to back candidates and instead moves to a publicly financed election that is.  But let&#039;s face, professor, that has about the same chance of happening as a snow ball&#039;s chance in hell of not melting.  But I digress. While I understand your reasoning based on the above referenced context, the fact is, MANY ballot props that have been previously enacted have done a hell of a lot of good for the COMMON good.  Case in point, the recently enacted Prop 68.  I could go on but I won&#039;t bore you especially since as a law professor, you are well aware of the various ballot props.  I suppose it&#039;s rather easy to live in an ivory tower collecting a paycheck from academia, but out here in the REAL world where most people have to work REAL jobs, it&#039;s not quite so cut and dried.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the writer of this piece wants to remove ballot propositions because he doesn&#8217;t like that the voters of this state actually have a say in what they want versus what the schizo State Assembly wants?  I call BS.  Citing the fact that most props are backed up by millionaires with &#8220;pet projects&#8221; is not a reason primarily because that particular group has no chance of being removed from the equation in the first place.  Well, not unless the state nullifies corporate money to back candidates and instead moves to a publicly financed election that is.  But let&#8217;s face, professor, that has about the same chance of happening as a snow ball&#8217;s chance in hell of not melting.  But I digress. While I understand your reasoning based on the above referenced context, the fact is, MANY ballot props that have been previously enacted have done a hell of a lot of good for the COMMON good.  Case in point, the recently enacted Prop 68.  I could go on but I won&#8217;t bore you especially since as a law professor, you are well aware of the various ballot props.  I suppose it&#8217;s rather easy to live in an ivory tower collecting a paycheck from academia, but out here in the REAL world where most people have to work REAL jobs, it&#8217;s not quite so cut and dried.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
