<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Google Successfully Amends Adwords Contract to Add Arbitration&#8211;AdTrader v. Google	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/04/google-successfully-amends-adwords-contract-to-add-arbitration-adtrader-v-google.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/04/google-successfully-amends-adwords-contract-to-add-arbitration-adtrader-v-google.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 04:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Robin Moore		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/04/google-successfully-amends-adwords-contract-to-add-arbitration-adtrader-v-google.htm#comment-2161</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robin Moore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 04:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=18634#comment-2161</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Just a quick correction: In your penultimate bullet, you wrote that &quot;[t]he opinion doesn&#039;t mention email notification . . .&quot;, but it does mention it on p. 7 &quot;Google’s &lt;b&gt;email notice&lt;/b&gt; and the September 2017 AdWords Agreement make it clear that advertisers can freely opt out of the Dispute Resolution Agreement provision.&quot; The opinion also mentions email notice on pages 1 and 4. Hope that helps! 

Also, Google did a nice job future-proofing their opt-out clause by stating that, to opt out, users &quot;must notify Google as set forth below within 30 days of the first acceptance date of any version of these Terms containing an arbitration provision . . . .&quot; By virtue of this language, Google won&#039;t be re-opening the opt-out window with its next update. It&#039;s a subtle point and one that is easy for practitioners to mess up.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick correction: In your penultimate bullet, you wrote that &#8220;[t]he opinion doesn&#8217;t mention email notification . . .&#8221;, but it does mention it on p. 7 &#8220;Google’s <b>email notice</b> and the September 2017 AdWords Agreement make it clear that advertisers can freely opt out of the Dispute Resolution Agreement provision.&#8221; The opinion also mentions email notice on pages 1 and 4. Hope that helps! </p>
<p>Also, Google did a nice job future-proofing their opt-out clause by stating that, to opt out, users &#8220;must notify Google as set forth below within 30 days of the first acceptance date of any version of these Terms containing an arbitration provision . . . .&#8221; By virtue of this language, Google won&#8217;t be re-opening the opt-out window with its next update. It&#8217;s a subtle point and one that is easy for practitioners to mess up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Randy Lockdall		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/04/google-successfully-amends-adwords-contract-to-add-arbitration-adtrader-v-google.htm#comment-2103</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randy Lockdall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 01:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=18634#comment-2103</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Seems that America when it comes to individual rights is going backwards faster than ever.  Major corporations, some of which are basically monopolies or oligarchies can simply turned a blind eye to problems by legislating their responsibilities away.  False clicks are a perfect example of an issue that seems common on Google, primarily because the same companies and individuals who market Google services, see the Google Adwords customer as a primary target.  This is a paradox, difficult to prove anyway, but what billionaires, banks and large corporations and their lawyers do best is protect their own interests.  Eventually like a roaring lion they gobble up everything and everyone.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems that America when it comes to individual rights is going backwards faster than ever.  Major corporations, some of which are basically monopolies or oligarchies can simply turned a blind eye to problems by legislating their responsibilities away.  False clicks are a perfect example of an issue that seems common on Google, primarily because the same companies and individuals who market Google services, see the Google Adwords customer as a primary target.  This is a paradox, difficult to prove anyway, but what billionaires, banks and large corporations and their lawyers do best is protect their own interests.  Eventually like a roaring lion they gobble up everything and everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
