Comments on: Ripoff Report Is “Lucky” Plaintiff Didn’t Allege Extortion–Albert v. Ragland https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/03/ripoff-report-is-lucky-plaintiff-didnt-allege-extortion-albert-v-ragland.htm Wed, 07 Mar 2018 15:21:44 +0000 hourly 1 By: FIBER0PTIC https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2018/03/ripoff-report-is-lucky-plaintiff-didnt-allege-extortion-albert-v-ragland.htm#comment-2049 Tue, 06 Mar 2018 21:55:00 +0000 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=18386#comment-2049 You can also post/write a message in a newspaper or possibly a blog (with 2 subscribers) and claim that because the public could view message free of charge at anytime for 4 to 6 weeks it is legally accepted as being a “public notice”?

Send a message to 10,000 ffa (free for all) sites that not a single person will view, would that be public notice?

Above it says she “Miss, Albert” is known as a public interest, define public interest. How does the court decide who or what is of public interest?

I still want to know how Kim Kardashian made Pornhub.com #12 most viewed pornstars list.

Add some color…….Could always claim it’s Art vs. Opinion.

]]>