<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Can Blogging Violate the Fair Housing Act?&#8211;Revock v. Cowpet Bay West Condo Ass&#8217;n	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2017/04/can-blogging-violate-the-fair-housing-act-revock-v-cowpet-bay-west-condo-assn.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2017/04/can-blogging-violate-the-fair-housing-act-revock-v-cowpet-bay-west-condo-assn.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 17:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Hans_Bader		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2017/04/can-blogging-violate-the-fair-housing-act-revock-v-cowpet-bay-west-condo-assn.htm#comment-1823</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hans_Bader]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 17:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=17076#comment-1823</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This ruling menaces free speech, and adopts an overly expansive interpretation of the Fair Housing Act, in its ruling against the blogger defendants, as I explain at this link:

http://libertyunyielding.com/2017/04/13/court-revives-harassment-lawsuit-blog-posts-menacing-free-speech/

I am a lawyer who used to practice civil-rights law for a living.

Legal commentator Walter Olson criticizes the Third Circuit&#039;s ruling at this link:

https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/04/third-circuit-bloggers-criticized-condo-neighbors-emotional-support-dogs-must-face-civil-rights-suit/

Lawyer Scott Greenfield questions the ruling at this link:

https://blog.simplejustice.us/2017/04/13/the-third-circuits-support-dog-house/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This ruling menaces free speech, and adopts an overly expansive interpretation of the Fair Housing Act, in its ruling against the blogger defendants, as I explain at this link:</p>
<p><a href="http://libertyunyielding.com/2017/04/13/court-revives-harassment-lawsuit-blog-posts-menacing-free-speech/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://libertyunyielding.com/2017/04/13/court-revives-harassment-lawsuit-blog-posts-menacing-free-speech/</a></p>
<p>I am a lawyer who used to practice civil-rights law for a living.</p>
<p>Legal commentator Walter Olson criticizes the Third Circuit&#8217;s ruling at this link:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/04/third-circuit-bloggers-criticized-condo-neighbors-emotional-support-dogs-must-face-civil-rights-suit/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/04/third-circuit-bloggers-criticized-condo-neighbors-emotional-support-dogs-must-face-civil-rights-suit/</a></p>
<p>Lawyer Scott Greenfield questions the ruling at this link:</p>
<p><a href="https://blog.simplejustice.us/2017/04/13/the-third-circuits-support-dog-house/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://blog.simplejustice.us/2017/04/13/the-third-circuits-support-dog-house/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The Third Circuit&#8217;s (Support) Dog House &#124; Simple Justice		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2017/04/can-blogging-violate-the-fair-housing-act-revock-v-cowpet-bay-west-condo-assn.htm#comment-1822</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Third Circuit&#8217;s (Support) Dog House &#124; Simple Justice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 11:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=17076#comment-1822</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Well, sometimes the answer is no, when the rules of private accommodations clash with government regulations. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Well, sometimes the answer is no, when the rules of private accommodations clash with government regulations. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Third Circuit: neighbors who criticized condo residents over emotional support dogs must face civil rights suit - Overlawyered		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2017/04/can-blogging-violate-the-fair-housing-act-revock-v-cowpet-bay-west-condo-assn.htm#comment-1820</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Third Circuit: neighbors who criticized condo residents over emotional support dogs must face civil rights suit - Overlawyered]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 22:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=17076#comment-1820</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Hans Bader and Eric Goldman, who got to the case before either of [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Hans Bader and Eric Goldman, who got to the case before either of [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: CLIP-ings: April 7, 2017 &#8211; CLIP-ings		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2017/04/can-blogging-violate-the-fair-housing-act-revock-v-cowpet-bay-west-condo-assn.htm#comment-1814</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CLIP-ings: April 7, 2017 &#8211; CLIP-ings]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 14:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=17076#comment-1814</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Unfree Eggspression: In an opinion lacking an analysis of First Amendment issues, a federal court has held that two bloggers interfered with the exercise of residents’ fair housing rights when they published numerous online posts deriding the residents for keeping emotional support dogs in their Virgin Islands condos despite the condominium association’s “no dogs” rule. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Unfree Eggspression: In an opinion lacking an analysis of First Amendment issues, a federal court has held that two bloggers interfered with the exercise of residents’ fair housing rights when they published numerous online posts deriding the residents for keeping emotional support dogs in their Virgin Islands condos despite the condominium association’s “no dogs” rule. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
