Comments on: Revisiting If Suing Bloggers For Copyright Infringement Can Be Profitable–BWP v. Mishka https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2017/02/revisiting-if-suing-bloggers-for-copyright-infringement-can-be-profitable-bwp-v-mishka.htm Fri, 03 Mar 2017 16:53:44 +0000 hourly 1 By: Preston Koerner https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2017/02/revisiting-if-suing-bloggers-for-copyright-infringement-can-be-profitable-bwp-v-mishka.htm#comment-1798 Wed, 01 Mar 2017 19:14:00 +0000 http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=16961#comment-1798 In reply to Eric Goldman.

Yeah, I should’ve realized that. After some searching, it sounds like MSCD recommends “legal fees and expenses”.

]]> By: Eric Goldman https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2017/02/revisiting-if-suing-bloggers-for-copyright-infringement-can-be-profitable-bwp-v-mishka.htm#comment-1797 Wed, 01 Mar 2017 19:09:00 +0000 http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=16961#comment-1797 In reply to Preston Koerner.

A fair question. Actually, the court put in the [sic] and I just quoted the court

]]> By: Preston Koerner https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2017/02/revisiting-if-suing-bloggers-for-copyright-infringement-can-be-profitable-bwp-v-mishka.htm#comment-1796 Wed, 01 Mar 2017 18:50:00 +0000 http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=16961#comment-1796 Curious but why did you put [sic] after attorney fees? I see many variants including attorney’s fees, attorneys’ fees, and attorney fees, and it baffles me every time. I don’t see court’s costs or courts’ costs, so why not use “attorney fees” as a reference to the category or type of fees and not the number of attorneys possessing those fees. Thoughts?

]]>