<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Does Google&#8217;s Non-Disclosure Agreement With Employees Overreach? (Guest Blog Post)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2017/01/does-googles-non-disclosure-agreement-with-employees-overreach-guest-blog-post.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2017/01/does-googles-non-disclosure-agreement-with-employees-overreach-guest-blog-post.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 18:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Internet Freud		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2017/01/does-googles-non-disclosure-agreement-with-employees-overreach-guest-blog-post.htm#comment-1747</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Internet Freud]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 18:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=16794#comment-1747</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Apparently, a number of people have contradicted Tom Arnold as to the existence of such a tape, and he has backed off of the allegation (including after stating he would make it public, damn the consequences).  This column presumes such a tape exists, and in this way appears to be propagating &quot;fake news,&quot; and not just commenting on the appropriate breadth of NDA&#039;s.  Why?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, a number of people have contradicted Tom Arnold as to the existence of such a tape, and he has backed off of the allegation (including after stating he would make it public, damn the consequences).  This column presumes such a tape exists, and in this way appears to be propagating &#8220;fake news,&#8221; and not just commenting on the appropriate breadth of NDA&#8217;s.  Why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
