<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Another Tortured DMCA Online Safe Harbor Ruling&#8211;EMI v. MP3Tunes	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2016/11/another-tortured-dmca-online-safe-harbor-ruling-emi-v-mp3tunes.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2016/11/another-tortured-dmca-online-safe-harbor-ruling-emi-v-mp3tunes.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 14:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Soheil farhadi		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2016/11/another-tortured-dmca-online-safe-harbor-ruling-emi-v-mp3tunes.htm#comment-2268</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Soheil farhadi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 14:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=16604#comment-2268</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[tnx
https://turingsanat.com/product-category/smarthome/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tnx<br />
<a href="https://turingsanat.com/product-category/smarthome/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://turingsanat.com/product-category/smarthome/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sana Khan		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2016/11/another-tortured-dmca-online-safe-harbor-ruling-emi-v-mp3tunes.htm#comment-2176</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sana Khan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 10:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=16604#comment-2176</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Without reading the case and the specific language they used regarding this, my take is that the one statutory damages per album rule is still intact.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without reading the case and the specific language they used regarding this, my take is that the one statutory damages per album rule is still intact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: radcock		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2016/11/another-tortured-dmca-online-safe-harbor-ruling-emi-v-mp3tunes.htm#comment-1712</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[radcock]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=16604#comment-1712</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Just one small note pertaining to statutory damages per album and your worry about all songs in an album being considered digital singles. Without reading the case and the specific language they used regarding this, my take is that the one statutory damages per album rule is still intact. Rather, this is allowing singles that are almost always released ahead of the main album release, as their own &quot;album&quot; or &quot;EP&quot;, to be considered for this stat damages rule. For example, one time I bought one of these singles on iTunes, liked it, and decided to buy the whole album (with 10 or so songs including the one I just bought). However, I essentially had to buy the same song twice, and the &quot;complete my album&quot; feature didn&#039;t work because I had bought the song originally on the &quot;wrong&quot; album. 

If interpreted this way it would still potentially double the amount of albums as usually the most popular song is released early in this format now and on the radio. But one could most likely avoid multiplying the number of &quot;albums&quot; under this rule by 10+. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just one small note pertaining to statutory damages per album and your worry about all songs in an album being considered digital singles. Without reading the case and the specific language they used regarding this, my take is that the one statutory damages per album rule is still intact. Rather, this is allowing singles that are almost always released ahead of the main album release, as their own &#8220;album&#8221; or &#8220;EP&#8221;, to be considered for this stat damages rule. For example, one time I bought one of these singles on iTunes, liked it, and decided to buy the whole album (with 10 or so songs including the one I just bought). However, I essentially had to buy the same song twice, and the &#8220;complete my album&#8221; feature didn&#8217;t work because I had bought the song originally on the &#8220;wrong&#8221; album. </p>
<p>If interpreted this way it would still potentially double the amount of albums as usually the most popular song is released early in this format now and on the radio. But one could most likely avoid multiplying the number of &#8220;albums&#8221; under this rule by 10+. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
