<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Adding Derogatory Caption to Photo Meme Can Be False Light&#8211;S.E. v. Chmerkovskiy	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2016/11/adding-derogatory-caption-to-photo-meme-can-be-false-light-s-e-v-chmerkovskiy.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2016/11/adding-derogatory-caption-to-photo-meme-can-be-false-light-s-e-v-chmerkovskiy.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 14:03:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: CLIP-ings: December 2, 2016 &#8211; CLIP-ings		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2016/11/adding-derogatory-caption-to-photo-meme-can-be-false-light-s-e-v-chmerkovskiy.htm#comment-1738</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CLIP-ings: December 2, 2016 &#8211; CLIP-ings]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 14:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=16694#comment-1738</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Ho! Ho! Hold It Before You Post That Meme! The legality of memes has come into question in a false light invasion of privacy case in which a “Dancing with the Stars” contestant publicly humiliated a child with Down Syndrome by adding a derogatory caption on an already-circulated photo of the child; after the mother requested he take down the image, the accused refused and defended his actions by asserting that the child’s obesity was a matter of public concern. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Ho! Ho! Hold It Before You Post That Meme! The legality of memes has come into question in a false light invasion of privacy case in which a “Dancing with the Stars” contestant publicly humiliated a child with Down Syndrome by adding a derogatory caption on an already-circulated photo of the child; after the mother requested he take down the image, the accused refused and defended his actions by asserting that the child’s obesity was a matter of public concern. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
