https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2016/05/proposed-eu-regulation-on-cross-border-access-to-copyrighted-content-guest-blog-post.htm Tue, 03 May 2016 00:09:00 +0000 hourly 1 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2016/05/proposed-eu-regulation-on-cross-border-access-to-copyrighted-content-guest-blog-post.htm#comment-1519 Tue, 03 May 2016 00:09:00 +0000 http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=15777#comment-1519 Yes, to a certain degree it is. Although search engines are not the typical service providers that the proposal has in mind, the subscription services mentioned in EC documents as covered by the proposal have search functions that could be affected by a user’s exercise of the “right to be forgotten.” Access to such results will then be geoblocked in the country of the request – except (according to the proposed regulation) for EU users who are only temporarily present in the country, enjoy cross-border portability, and can therefore access the search results as if they were in their EU country of residence.

]]> https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2016/05/proposed-eu-regulation-on-cross-border-access-to-copyrighted-content-guest-blog-post.htm#comment-1518 Mon, 02 May 2016 23:32:00 +0000 http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=15777#comment-1518 Is cross-border portability just the flip side of the position on territoriality expressed by the CNIL in right-to-be-forgotten?

]]>