<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: CSS and HTML Code May Be Copyrightable&#8211;Media.net v. Netseer	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2016/03/css-and-html-code-may-be-copyrightable-media-net-v-netseer.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2016/03/css-and-html-code-may-be-copyrightable-media-net-v-netseer.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 11:32:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: CLIP-ings: March 11, 2016 &#8211; CLIP-ings		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2016/03/css-and-html-code-may-be-copyrightable-media-net-v-netseer.htm#comment-1505</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CLIP-ings: March 11, 2016 &#8211; CLIP-ings]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 11:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=15625#comment-1505</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Creative Coding? A federal district court held that HTML and CSS formatting codes may be copyrightable, despite the Copyright Office Compendium’s assertion that those codes generally do not satisfy the requisite level of creativity for protection. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Creative Coding? A federal district court held that HTML and CSS formatting codes may be copyrightable, despite the Copyright Office Compendium’s assertion that those codes generally do not satisfy the requisite level of creativity for protection. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
