<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Shutterfly Can&#8217;t Shake Face-Scanning Privacy Lawsuit	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2016/01/shutterfly-cant-shake-face-scanning-privacy-lawsuit.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2016/01/shutterfly-cant-shake-face-scanning-privacy-lawsuit.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 14:40:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Shutterfly Stumbles in Face Scan Lawsuit, Facebook case still undecided - Fortune		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2016/01/shutterfly-cant-shake-face-scanning-privacy-lawsuit.htm#comment-1454</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shutterfly Stumbles in Face Scan Lawsuit, Facebook case still undecided - Fortune]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 14:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=15392#comment-1454</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] skeptical the face scanning cases will get much further. According to Internet law experts at the Eric Goldman Blog, the Illinois court should have applied the photo exception; the scholars also suggest the lawsuits [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] skeptical the face scanning cases will get much further. According to Internet law experts at the Eric Goldman Blog, the Illinois court should have applied the photo exception; the scholars also suggest the lawsuits [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
