<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: No Liability for Linking to Defamatory Content&#8211;Life Designs Ranch v. Sommer	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2015/11/no-liability-for-linking-to-defamatory-content-life-designs-ranch-v-sommer.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2015/11/no-liability-for-linking-to-defamatory-content-life-designs-ranch-v-sommer.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2015 12:24:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Another Court Says It’s OK To Link To Defamatory Content–Slozer v. Slattery		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2015/11/no-liability-for-linking-to-defamatory-content-life-designs-ranch-v-sommer.htm#comment-1435</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Another Court Says It’s OK To Link To Defamatory Content–Slozer v. Slattery]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2015 12:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=15131#comment-1435</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] content isn’t a defamatory republication of the content. I just blogged on a similar result in Life Designs Ranch, Inc. v. Sommer. The only twist here is that the person posted the link to Facebook and then “liked” their own [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] content isn’t a defamatory republication of the content. I just blogged on a similar result in Life Designs Ranch, Inc. v. Sommer. The only twist here is that the person posted the link to Facebook and then “liked” their own [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Another Court Says It&#8217;s OK To Link To Defamatory Content&#8211;Slozer v. Slattery		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2015/11/no-liability-for-linking-to-defamatory-content-life-designs-ranch-v-sommer.htm#comment-1433</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Another Court Says It&#8217;s OK To Link To Defamatory Content&#8211;Slozer v. Slattery]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2015 01:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=15131#comment-1433</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] isn&#8217;t a defamatory republication of the content. I just blogged on a similar result in Life Designs Ranch, Inc. v. Sommer. The only twist here is that the person posted the link to Facebook and then &#8220;liked&#8221; [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] isn&#8217;t a defamatory republication of the content. I just blogged on a similar result in Life Designs Ranch, Inc. v. Sommer. The only twist here is that the person posted the link to Facebook and then &#8220;liked&#8221; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
