https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2015/11/another-court-says-its-ok-to-link-to-defamatory-content-slozer-v-slattery.htm Thu, 26 Nov 2015 05:05:00 +0000 hourly 1 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2015/11/another-court-says-its-ok-to-link-to-defamatory-content-slozer-v-slattery.htm#comment-1436 Thu, 26 Nov 2015 05:05:00 +0000 http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=15152#comment-1436 Uh, idk what’s happening in Curtis Neely’s comments…but I am curious: is it republication to comment in any fashion? Whether it’s pulling a quote from the link and attaching it alongside the link, or summarizing a version of the contents therein, or entirely misrepresenting the guts of the content? I feel at least one would be “republication” (and I am not sure if republication is even actionable, without knowing the case law).

]]> https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2015/11/another-court-says-its-ok-to-link-to-defamatory-content-slozer-v-slattery.htm#comment-1434 Mon, 23 Nov 2015 03:50:00 +0000 http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=15152#comment-1434 This is solid result in America and is beating a dead horse, which is regularly futile, unless looking for flies. Who sees the swarm of flies?
THIS WOULD NOT BE THE RESULT ANYWHERE BESIDES America.
RTBF = This has already been decided be the European Court THE OPPOSITE way against GOOG for linking to “defamatory” material. This was appealed and affirmed and GOOG may soon be fined substantially when violating this ruling.
See discussed at http://Human-Dignity-US.org

]]>