<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: App Users Aren&#8217;t &#8220;Subscribers&#8221; Under the VPPA&#8211;Ellis v. Cartoon Network	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2015/10/app-users-arent-subscribers-under-the-vppa-ellis-v-cartoon-network.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2015/10/app-users-arent-subscribers-under-the-vppa-ellis-v-cartoon-network.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2015 14:18:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Paid Television versus Free Streaming: What it means for your privacy. &#187; NC Journal of Law &#38; Technology		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2015/10/app-users-arent-subscribers-under-the-vppa-ellis-v-cartoon-network.htm#comment-1420</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paid Television versus Free Streaming: What it means for your privacy. &#187; NC Journal of Law &#38; Technology]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2015 14:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=15030#comment-1420</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Network for disclosing personally identifiable information in form of the Andriod ID so that Bango easily could derive his identity and thus knew both his identity and the videos he viewed. Ellis argued that he was a “subscriber” of Cartoon Network and thus he is a “consumer” [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Network for disclosing personally identifiable information in form of the Andriod ID so that Bango easily could derive his identity and thus knew both his identity and the videos he viewed. Ellis argued that he was a “subscriber” of Cartoon Network and thus he is a “consumer” [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: CLIP-ings: October 15, 2015 &#124; CLIP-ings		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2015/10/app-users-arent-subscribers-under-the-vppa-ellis-v-cartoon-network.htm#comment-1414</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CLIP-ings: October 15, 2015 &#124; CLIP-ings]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=15030#comment-1414</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Subscription Cancelled: The Eleventh Circuit held that under the Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA), a plaintiff who downloaded Cartoon Network’s video streaming app is not a “subscriber” and therefore not entitled to the law’s protection. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Subscription Cancelled: The Eleventh Circuit held that under the Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA), a plaintiff who downloaded Cartoon Network’s video streaming app is not a “subscriber” and therefore not entitled to the law’s protection. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
