https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2015/10/another-censorious-copyright-case-results-in-a-big-fee-shift-inglewood-v-teixeira.htm Wed, 17 Jan 2024 15:11:13 +0000 hourly 1 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2015/10/another-censorious-copyright-case-results-in-a-big-fee-shift-inglewood-v-teixeira.htm#comment-1425 Tue, 27 Oct 2015 21:29:00 +0000 http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=15057#comment-1425 Great news. When will trolls like Carolyn Wright aka “Photo Attorney” get their comeuppance? It has to happen soon.

]]> https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2015/10/another-censorious-copyright-case-results-in-a-big-fee-shift-inglewood-v-teixeira.htm#comment-1418 Mon, 19 Oct 2015 21:22:23 +0000 http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=15057#comment-1418 […] of ill-fated attempts to litigate copyright claims that resulted in fee shifts. (See, e.g., the City of Inglewood ruling Eric recently blogged about.) There, the party claiming fair use had an argument that the […]

]]> https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2015/10/another-censorious-copyright-case-results-in-a-big-fee-shift-inglewood-v-teixeira.htm#comment-1417 Sun, 18 Oct 2015 03:01:00 +0000 http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=15057#comment-1417 I presume they try this copyright tack because defamation is a non-starter, the potential plaintiffs being all public figures?

]]> https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2015/10/another-censorious-copyright-case-results-in-a-big-fee-shift-inglewood-v-teixeira.htm#comment-1416 Sat, 17 Oct 2015 14:44:00 +0000 http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=15057#comment-1416 Certainly not when taxpayers bear theses costs.

]]>