https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2015/07/seventh-circuit-data-breach-victims-have-standing-based-on-future-harm.htm Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:11:31 +0000 hourly 1 https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2015/07/seventh-circuit-data-breach-victims-have-standing-based-on-future-harm.htm#comment-1356 Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:11:31 +0000 http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=14533#comment-1356 […] worth contrasting this ruling with the ruling in the Neiman Marcus case, which I recently blogged about, where the court found standing for putative victims of a retail […]

]]> https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2015/07/seventh-circuit-data-breach-victims-have-standing-based-on-future-harm.htm#comment-1354 Wed, 29 Jul 2015 23:01:45 +0000 http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=14533#comment-1354 […] To learn more about the Neiman Marcus ruling and what it means, you can find detailed write-ups by Reuters’ Alison Frankel, and at National Law Review and the Technology & Marketing Law Blog. […]

]]> https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2015/07/seventh-circuit-data-breach-victims-have-standing-based-on-future-harm.htm#comment-1348 Fri, 24 Jul 2015 22:52:00 +0000 http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=14533#comment-1348 Very minor point, but the dismissal at the district court was on 12b1 grounds, not 12b6.

]]>