Comments on: Sixth Circuit Says Informational Fax Isn’t an “Ad”–Sandusky v. Medco https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2015/06/sixth-circuit-says-informational-fax-isnt-an-ad-sandusky-v-medco.htm Mon, 08 Jun 2015 00:24:00 +0000 hourly 1 By: Ehud Gavron https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2015/06/sixth-circuit-says-informational-fax-isnt-an-ad-sandusky-v-medco.htm#comment-1310 Mon, 08 Jun 2015 00:24:00 +0000 http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=14374#comment-1310 “but the court says that it is not a -fax- because it doesn’t list any products”

I think you meant that the court says it is not an -advertisement-…

(dashes mine)

]]> By: curtisneeley https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2015/06/sixth-circuit-says-informational-fax-isnt-an-ad-sandusky-v-medco.htm#comment-1308 Fri, 05 Jun 2015 18:01:00 +0000 http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=14374#comment-1308 Wire, oral and electronic communications were added to 18 U.S. C §2511 in 1986. Some circuits protect electronic communications and others require these be contemporaneous to receive protection. Where is the definition of ***FAX*** and what keeps an email or website from being a ***FAX*** in this decade?

]]>