<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Court Rejects First Amendment Challenge Against Cyberharassment Charge	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2015/06/court-rejects-first-amendment-challenge-against-cyberharassment-charge.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2015/06/court-rejects-first-amendment-challenge-against-cyberharassment-charge.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 17:30:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: CLIP-ings June 26, 2015 &#124; CLIP-ings		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2015/06/court-rejects-first-amendment-challenge-against-cyberharassment-charge.htm#comment-1317</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CLIP-ings June 26, 2015 &#124; CLIP-ings]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2015 11:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=14405#comment-1317</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Cyberharassment Not Free Speech: A New York district court held that a man’s statements on websites he created to deride his former employer were not protected by the First Amendment because they were defamatory and part of a “campaign of retaliatory harassment.” [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Cyberharassment Not Free Speech: A New York district court held that a man’s statements on websites he created to deride his former employer were not protected by the First Amendment because they were defamatory and part of a “campaign of retaliatory harassment.” [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
