As, I said before, New York States Highest Courts are corrupt, and the robes of Justice are stained with lies. We will not give up this fight until we win our case against the Teamsters Union, we want our day in court and until we get it, we will remain going through the motions.

The Scale of Justice is about truth and laws, the decision of the court on the case of Ricci vs. Teamsters Union Local 456, is complete smoke and mirrors, and, a panel of three stooges; These United States Court of Appeals For The Second Circuit Judges, Hon. Dennis Jacobs,Hon. Raymond J. Lohier, Jr., Circuit Judges, Laura Taylor Swain, District Judge, all of them are corrupt. They denied the Ricci’s Motions, every single one of there motions.

We all know Hitler was an evil man, but now, we can see the “Jewish Justices” in New York State can be added to the mix of what an evil dictatorship represents these days in America. There is nothing honorable about these Judges they don’t practice the laws of Justice, and they disregarded “The Ricci’s” constitutional rights.

30 DAYS TIME BARRED….LOL IT’S UNCONSTITUTIONAL

The law states… With respect to civil lawsuits, A statute of limitations is unconstitutional if it immediately curtails an existing remedy or provides so little time that it deprives an individual of a reasonable opportunity to start a lawsuit.

It’s unconstitutional to deny “The Ricci’s” a right to sue under the “Stature of Limitations” for 30-days time-barred and under the law for which their circumstances fall therein, as unconstitutional.

These Judges are all corrupt, Westchester County Judges, Hon. Robert M. DiBella, Judge DiBella is anything but honorable, this man belongs behind bars with the rest of the honorable dis honorable that are definitely “NOT” honorable. The same goes for Judge Nelson Roman in the Westchester County Supreme Court, corrupt, corrupt, corrupt! New York State Courts are Corrupt!

In the New York State Appeals Court, Chief Judge, Robert A. Katzmann and his Clerk of the Court, Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, THEY WORK “DIRTY” TOGETHER BEHIND THE SECRET DOORS of INJUSTICE.

The Ricci’s presented their case to the best of their ability, as a pro se.

The Ricci’s, are still asking the Appeals Court to recall the mandate and reconsider before we file a Petition for Writ of Certiorari. If necessary, that will be next.

We’re just going through the motions until we get our day in court because it’s our constitutional right and we know it!

Sooner or later our perseverance and persistence will win us our day in court. They can continue to stamp our motions DOA, but, I assure you, we are not DOA! We are very much alive and kicking, our voices are loud and strong and we can be heard as high up as the heavens….JUSTICE LORD WE WANT JUSTICE (Psalm 91).

Corruption Hides Behind The Laws of Congress

Conspiracy and Corruption Hide Behind The Robes of Justice

New York State Justices Robes are Stained and Tainted

These Judges are all corrupt, Westchester County Judges, Hon. Robert M. DiBella, Judge DiBella is anything but honorable, this man belongs behind bars with the rest of the honorable that are not honorable. The same goes for Judge Nelson Roman in the Westchester County Supreme Court, corrupt, corrupt, corrupt! In the New York State Appeals Court, Chief Judge, Robert A. Katzmann and his Clerk of the Court, Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, dirty corrupt.

These United States Court of Appeals For The Second Circuit Judges, Hon. Dennis Jacobs,Hon. Raymond J. Lohier, Jr., Circuit Judges, Laura Taylor Swain, District Judge, all corrupt. These people are the most corrupt Judges in the court system. They work behind the scenes with the Court Clerks and Attorney’s to coverup for corrupt Judges decisions, and for Attorneys that represent corrupt organizations! These Attorney’s represent organizations that are documented in newspapers and court documents that they have ties to organized crime.

The corrupt Attorney’s and Organizations, Teamsters Local 456, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, IBT, IRB, The Times, The New York Times, GoDaddy.Com, any organization with enough cashola to buy justice, corrupt law enforcement ties, corrupt political ties, and so-on, that is serious because they’re all getting away with Obstruction of Justice. The courts and Judges have no credibilty anymore, none whatsoever.

THE JUDGES GOT IT WRONG! (JACOBS and LOHIER, and SWAIN).

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs Peter and Barbara Ricci (“the Riccis”) bring this action pro se

against GoDaddy.com, LLC (“GoDaddy”) and the Teamsters Union Local 456 (the “Union” or the “Teamsters”), alleging that false statements about the Riccis in a Union newsletter were republished on a website hosted on GoDaddy’s servers. As relevant here, plaintiffs sue GoDaddy for defamation; they sue the Teamsters for retaliation in violation of sections 7 and 8 of the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 157, 158(b)(1)(A), and for breach of the NLRA’s implied duty of fair representation. The defamation claims fail because GoDaddy enjoys immunity from this suit under the Communications Decency Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. § 230. The labor claims are barred by the NLRA’s six‐ month statute of limitations, 29 U.S.C. § 160(b). We affirm. AGAIN, THE JUDGES GOT IT WRONG! (JACOBS and LOHIER, and SWAIN).

GODADDY.COM DOES NOT HAVE IMMUNITY UNDER THIS LAW:

Communications Decency Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. § 230.

GODADDY.COM, cannot provide this court with this law statue “provided by another information content provider” because they themselves are CO-CONSPIRATORS with the TEAMSTERS. GODADDY.COM are the creators of THEWESTCHESTERNEWSLETTER.COM!

The information must be “provided by another information content

provider,” i.e., the defendant must not be the “information content provider” of the harmful information at issue.

Communications Decency Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. § 230.

In analyzing the availability of the immunity offered by this provision, courts generally apply a three-prong test. A defendant must satisfy each of the three prongs to gain the benefit of the immunity:

The defendant must be a “provider or user” of an “interactive computer service.”

The cause of action asserted by the plaintiff must treat the defendant as the “publisher or speaker” of the harmful information at issue.

The information must be “provided by another information content provider,” i.e., the defendant must not be the “information content provider” of the harmful information at issue.

WHEN GODADDY.COM Registered, http://thewestchesternewsletter, they also created the newsletter on August 8, 2012. Ask them to release the name of the creators of THEWESTCHESTERNEWSLETTER? They CANNOT provide this court with the CREATORS OF THIS BOGUS NEWSLETTER because they are the CREATORS and CO-CONSPIRATORS with the TEAMSTERS UNION in the creation of this BOGUS NEWSLETTER! THIS IS A CRIMINAL ACT! GODADDY.COM is not protected under the law for any criminal act they have played a role in, as, CREATORS AND CO-CONSPIRATORS. If they are claiming that they didn’t create the NEWSLETTER than they should be able to release the names of the people who did? GODADDY.COM was involved in this criminal act with the Teamsters from DAY ONE August 8, 2012. They should be held accountable for BEING THE CREATOR and CO-CONSPIRATOR, and they should not have the right to immunity for their actions.

HOWEVER, THOSE LAWS DO NOT PROTECT GODADDY.COM WHEN THEY ARE INVOLVED IN A CRIMINAL ACT.

This case is not over yet! We still have one more court to go to get Justice!

Go Daddy.Com has no credibilty, remember, they did this to a VIP Client! Who’s gonna trust them with their business anymore. Do Not trust GoDaddy.Com with your business because if you do, this is what happens. The Judges disregard the law in favor of them.

As I mentioned in my intro to the opening brief in Jones v. Dirty World (see: https://www.scribd.com/doc/183679179/Sarah-Jones-v-Dirty-World-Opening-Appellate-Brief), the 2nd Circuit had never issued a CDA ruling before. However, that was misleading because the 2nd Circuit is dominated by New York State, and of course the highest state court in NY (the Court of Appeals) previously issued the great decision in Shiamili v. The Real Estate Group of New York, Inc.,952 N.E.2d 1011, 17 N.Y.3d 281 (N.Y. 2011).

If we include this new decision, plus Jones (for the 6th Cir.) and Klayman v. Zuckerberg (for the D.C. Cir.), this means all federal appellate circuits have now published at least one CDA case.