<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Safeway Can&#8217;t Unilaterally Modify Online Terms Without Notice	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2015/01/safeway-cant-unilaterally-modify-online-terms-without-notice.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2015/01/safeway-cant-unilaterally-modify-online-terms-without-notice.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 21:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael Risch		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2015/01/safeway-cant-unilaterally-modify-online-terms-without-notice.htm#comment-1130</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Risch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 21:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=13588#comment-1130</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2015/01/safeway-cant-unilaterally-modify-online-terms-without-notice.htm#comment-1128&quot;&gt;mx&lt;/a&gt;.

Presumably there&#039;s a reasonableness factor built in (a la Feldman v. Google). It&#039;s a future&#039;s contract - you get the price everyone else is paying. I think they have an option that you don&#039;t have to get it if the price goes up (on produce, for example). At least they did years ago when I used the delivery service.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2015/01/safeway-cant-unilaterally-modify-online-terms-without-notice.htm#comment-1128">mx</a>.</p>
<p>Presumably there&#8217;s a reasonableness factor built in (a la Feldman v. Google). It&#8217;s a future&#8217;s contract &#8211; you get the price everyone else is paying. I think they have an option that you don&#8217;t have to get it if the price goes up (on produce, for example). At least they did years ago when I used the delivery service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: mx		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2015/01/safeway-cant-unilaterally-modify-online-terms-without-notice.htm#comment-1128</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 21:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=13588#comment-1128</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2015/01/safeway-cant-unilaterally-modify-online-terms-without-notice.htm#comment-1120&quot;&gt;Michael Risch&lt;/a&gt;.

What&#039;s the alternative though? If the prices on the website are just estimates and the prices you&#039;re charged don&#039;t match the physical store, then what stops Safeway from declaring an emergency price increase and charging you $150 for each bottle of soda? At least having the prices be equal to the in-store prices provides a certain bound of reasonableness to the estimated prices.

I&#039;d also be curious how pricing policies like this interact with laws like California B&#038;P 12024.2 (or other state mispricing laws) which make it illegal to charge more than the posted price for goods.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2015/01/safeway-cant-unilaterally-modify-online-terms-without-notice.htm#comment-1120">Michael Risch</a>.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the alternative though? If the prices on the website are just estimates and the prices you&#8217;re charged don&#8217;t match the physical store, then what stops Safeway from declaring an emergency price increase and charging you $150 for each bottle of soda? At least having the prices be equal to the in-store prices provides a certain bound of reasonableness to the estimated prices.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also be curious how pricing policies like this interact with laws like California B&amp;P 12024.2 (or other state mispricing laws) which make it illegal to charge more than the posted price for goods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael Risch		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2015/01/safeway-cant-unilaterally-modify-online-terms-without-notice.htm#comment-1120</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Risch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2015 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=13588#comment-1120</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve got no qualms with the outcome or reading this (especially an unassented to amendment!) against Safeway. But I didn&#039;t find the contract all that ambiguous. Your fruit can&#039;t be weighed at the time of the order. Sales may be over by the time you get your stuff two weeks later. Your credit card is not charged at the time of the order - it&#039;s not a checkout.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got no qualms with the outcome or reading this (especially an unassented to amendment!) against Safeway. But I didn&#8217;t find the contract all that ambiguous. Your fruit can&#8217;t be weighed at the time of the order. Sales may be over by the time you get your stuff two weeks later. Your credit card is not charged at the time of the order &#8211; it&#8217;s not a checkout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
