<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: eBay Isn&#8217;t Liable for Selling Recalled Merchandise&#8211;Hinton v. Amazon	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2014/12/ebay-isnt-liable-for-selling-recalled-merchandise-hinton-v-amazon.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2014/12/ebay-isnt-liable-for-selling-recalled-merchandise-hinton-v-amazon.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 01:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: curtisneeley		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2014/12/ebay-isnt-liable-for-selling-recalled-merchandise-hinton-v-amazon.htm#comment-1092</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[curtisneeley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 01:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=13477#comment-1092</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I actually agree that the criminal nullification of 230 requires an actual criminal act done intentionally by the party and not simply providing a venue.
GOOG bypassing the authentication otherwise required by artist for display of their self-declared indecent art is the EXACT type criminal act intended for utterly shredding 230 protection from 18 U.S.C. §2511 for which 18 U.S.C. §2520 allows punitive damages.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=low+key+fine+art+nude+site%3Adeviantart.com%20!gi 
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=low+key+fine+art+nude+site%3Adeviantart.com%20!bi 

Links above leads you quietly to hundreds of conscientious artists who require authenticated filtration.  Visit the website from any of these anonymous criminal presentations and you will not see the images alleged to be sourced from these links!  You may sign-up to become a member of the site and then see these but not without affirming a legal  age and specifically requesting to see images labeled as adult.

GOOG and MSFT are therefore organized criminal conspirators.  MSFT has now stopped returning the colored charts I rated as not suitable for minors as well as all my art that is offered there for sale.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=curtis+neeley+site%3Adeviantart.com%20!gi 
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=curtis+neeley+site%3Adeviantart.com%20!bi 

The colored graphics and the naked photos that return are continued intentional violations of 18 U.S.C. §2511 and are also continued intentional violations of Ark Code Ann. 103 Computer Fraud felonies.

GOOG removed the book preview as I demanded be removed from a book scanned from a New York library. https://books.google.com/books?isbn=160020001X
https://books.google.com/books?id=aNnAMbNYZnEC&#038;dq=isbn:160020001X&#038;hl=en&#038;sa=X

I have a pending Motion for Summary Judgment before the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in the form of a Motion to Proceed on Appeal IFP.  If anyone besides GOOG broke this law it would be punished. I asked the FCC to create live links to the 136 attempts over the last two years to get caches updated that were denied by GOOG,  Normally the FCC would not support links in PDFs but left them all after this request.  http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=60001009594


American courts are generally immoral. I advised the Eighth Circuit this is my last pursuit of justice before an American court because the Supreme Court  is too elderly to still be judges in the EU or any honorable system of law.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually agree that the criminal nullification of 230 requires an actual criminal act done intentionally by the party and not simply providing a venue.<br />
GOOG bypassing the authentication otherwise required by artist for display of their self-declared indecent art is the EXACT type criminal act intended for utterly shredding 230 protection from 18 U.S.C. §2511 for which 18 U.S.C. §2520 allows punitive damages.</p>
<p><a href="https://duckduckgo.com/?q=low+key+fine+art+nude+site%3Adeviantart.com%20!gi" rel="nofollow ugc">https://duckduckgo.com/?q=low+key+fine+art+nude+site%3Adeviantart.com%20!gi</a><br />
<a href="https://duckduckgo.com/?q=low+key+fine+art+nude+site%3Adeviantart.com%20!bi" rel="nofollow ugc">https://duckduckgo.com/?q=low+key+fine+art+nude+site%3Adeviantart.com%20!bi</a> </p>
<p>Links above leads you quietly to hundreds of conscientious artists who require authenticated filtration.  Visit the website from any of these anonymous criminal presentations and you will not see the images alleged to be sourced from these links!  You may sign-up to become a member of the site and then see these but not without affirming a legal  age and specifically requesting to see images labeled as adult.</p>
<p>GOOG and MSFT are therefore organized criminal conspirators.  MSFT has now stopped returning the colored charts I rated as not suitable for minors as well as all my art that is offered there for sale.</p>
<p><a href="https://duckduckgo.com/?q=curtis+neeley+site%3Adeviantart.com%20!gi" rel="nofollow ugc">https://duckduckgo.com/?q=curtis+neeley+site%3Adeviantart.com%20!gi</a><br />
<a href="https://duckduckgo.com/?q=curtis+neeley+site%3Adeviantart.com%20!bi" rel="nofollow ugc">https://duckduckgo.com/?q=curtis+neeley+site%3Adeviantart.com%20!bi</a> </p>
<p>The colored graphics and the naked photos that return are continued intentional violations of 18 U.S.C. §2511 and are also continued intentional violations of Ark Code Ann. 103 Computer Fraud felonies.</p>
<p>GOOG removed the book preview as I demanded be removed from a book scanned from a New York library. <a href="https://books.google.com/books?isbn=160020001X" rel="nofollow ugc">https://books.google.com/books?isbn=160020001X</a><br />
<a href="https://books.google.com/books?id=aNnAMbNYZnEC&#038;dq=isbn:160020001X&#038;hl=en&#038;sa=X" rel="nofollow ugc">https://books.google.com/books?id=aNnAMbNYZnEC&#038;dq=isbn:160020001X&#038;hl=en&#038;sa=X</a></p>
<p>I have a pending Motion for Summary Judgment before the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in the form of a Motion to Proceed on Appeal IFP.  If anyone besides GOOG broke this law it would be punished. I asked the FCC to create live links to the 136 attempts over the last two years to get caches updated that were denied by GOOG,  Normally the FCC would not support links in PDFs but left them all after this request.  <a href="http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=60001009594" rel="nofollow ugc">http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=60001009594</a></p>
<p>American courts are generally immoral. I advised the Eighth Circuit this is my last pursuit of justice before an American court because the Supreme Court  is too elderly to still be judges in the EU or any honorable system of law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
