Comments on: Appeals Court Affirms Harassment Order Based on Vague Testimony of Indirect Contacts https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2014/12/appeals-court-affirms-harassment-order-based-on-vague-testimony-of-indirect-contacts.htm Mon, 08 Dec 2014 22:36:45 +0000 hourly 1 By: Appeals Court Affirms Harassment Order Based on Vague Testimony of Indirect Contacts | Boyd For Congress https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2014/12/appeals-court-affirms-harassment-order-based-on-vague-testimony-of-indirect-contacts.htm#comment-1071 Mon, 08 Dec 2014 22:36:45 +0000 http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=13426#comment-1071 […] This is a civil harassment case. Kwan and Murcia both worked at CVS but at different stores (both as managers). Kwan filed a request for a harassment restraining order against …read more […]

]]> By: Eric Goldman https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2014/12/appeals-court-affirms-harassment-order-based-on-vague-testimony-of-indirect-contacts.htm#comment-1070 Mon, 08 Dec 2014 18:35:00 +0000 http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=13426#comment-1070 In reply to Ehud Gavron.

Thanks! Fixed.

]]> By: Ehud Gavron https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2014/12/appeals-court-affirms-harassment-order-based-on-vague-testimony-of-indirect-contacts.htm#comment-1069 Mon, 08 Dec 2014 18:29:00 +0000 http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=13426#comment-1069 Typo – “that Kawn is entitled” should be Kwan… Thanks for the interesting read!

]]>