<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Fictional Software Brand In &#8216;Dark Knight Rises&#8217; Movie Doesn&#8217;t Infringe Real-Life Software Brand&#8211;Fortres Grand v. Warner Bros.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2014/08/fictional-software-brand-in-dark-knight-rises-doesnt-infringe-real-life-software-brand-fortres-grand-v-warner-bros.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2014/08/fictional-software-brand-in-dark-knight-rises-doesnt-infringe-real-life-software-brand-fortres-grand-v-warner-bros.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2014 21:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Natalie Hickey		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2014/08/fictional-software-brand-in-dark-knight-rises-doesnt-infringe-real-life-software-brand-fortres-grand-v-warner-bros.htm#comment-973</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Natalie Hickey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2014 21:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=12884#comment-973</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Eric, your excellent post calls to mind the &quot;Duff Beer&quot; case in Australia, where it was found that a real beer by that name passed off the fictional Duff Beer in the Simpsons. Differences? Distinctive, not descriptive, and an obvious attempt to free ride. Extract of case here: http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/tfisher/PILFoxvAus.htm]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Eric, your excellent post calls to mind the &#8220;Duff Beer&#8221; case in Australia, where it was found that a real beer by that name passed off the fictional Duff Beer in the Simpsons. Differences? Distinctive, not descriptive, and an obvious attempt to free ride. Extract of case here: <a href="http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/tfisher/PILFoxvAus.htm" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/tfisher/PILFoxvAus.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
