Comments on: Stalking Conviction For Friending a Prosecutor’s Facebook Friends?–State v. Moller https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2014/06/stalking-conviction-for-friending-a-prosecutors-facebook-friends-state-v-moller.htm Thu, 10 Jul 2014 17:17:04 +0000 hourly 1 By: First Amendment Precludes Disorderly Conduct Conviction for Ranting on Police Department Facebook Page https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2014/06/stalking-conviction-for-friending-a-prosecutors-facebook-friends-state-v-moller.htm#comment-937 Thu, 10 Jul 2014 17:17:04 +0000 http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=12515#comment-937 […] Stalking Conviction For Friending a Prosecutor’s Facebook Friends?–State v. Moller […]

]]> By: Criminal Cyberbullying Statute Violates First Amendment–New York v. Marquan | Technology & Marketing Law Blog https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2014/06/stalking-conviction-for-friending-a-prosecutors-facebook-friends-state-v-moller.htm#comment-921 Thu, 03 Jul 2014 16:38:28 +0000 http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=12515#comment-921 […] Stalking Conviction For Friending a Prosecutor’s Facebook Friends?–State v. Moller […]

]]> By: Sumit Jain https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2014/06/stalking-conviction-for-friending-a-prosecutors-facebook-friends-state-v-moller.htm#comment-927 Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:52:00 +0000 http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=12515#comment-927 Most of these modern society could make a new “celebrity” exterior just about everything phony and also lawless; certainly politics volumes.

buy youtube global views

]]> By: rivkat https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2014/06/stalking-conviction-for-friending-a-prosecutors-facebook-friends-state-v-moller.htm#comment-920 Sun, 29 Jun 2014 19:08:00 +0000 http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=12515#comment-920 My reaction is completely the opposite, and I think it is likely influenced by gender. My guess is that the vast majority of female professionals would feel physically threatened by a drive-by of their houses in combination with this other conduct, including the symbolic violence against the doll. (Abusers often engage in symbolic violence first. It is a very good way of communicating “I could hurt you.”) I know I would fear for my physical safety and that of my children. The reasonable person is allowed to be a woman, it seems to me. And I don’t think dissecting each incident and saying “this one wasn’t enough on its own” makes sense. The point of having a course of conduct offense is that each act adds up. I can’t see how the First Amendment precludes that, especially given the silencing effects on women of *not* prosecuting such conduct.

]]>