Comments on: Revenge Porn/Cyberstalking Conviction Doesn’t Violate First Amendment–US v. Osinger https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2014/06/revenge-porncyberstalking-conviction-doesnt-violate-first-amendment-us-v-osinger.htm Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:11:24 +0000 hourly 1 By: Library: A Round-up of Reading | Res Communis https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2014/06/revenge-porncyberstalking-conviction-doesnt-violate-first-amendment-us-v-osinger.htm#comment-905 Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:11:24 +0000 http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=12386#comment-905 […] Revenge Porn/Cyberstalking Conviction Doesn’t Violate First Amendment–US v. Osinger – Technology & Marketting Law Blog […]

]]> By: Stalking Conviction For Friending a Prosecutor’s Facebook Friends?–State v. Moller | Technology & Marketing Law Blog https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2014/06/revenge-porncyberstalking-conviction-doesnt-violate-first-amendment-us-v-osinger.htm#comment-904 Sun, 29 Jun 2014 17:10:00 +0000 http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=12386#comment-904 […] made by the court here is that this case is about conduct and not speech. But this case, like Osinger, a revenge porn case I blogged about recently, relies on a conduct/speech distinction that feels […]

]]> By: Osinger, The Revenge Porn Holding That Wasn’t | Simple Justice https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2014/06/revenge-porncyberstalking-conviction-doesnt-violate-first-amendment-us-v-osinger.htm#comment-903 Sat, 07 Jun 2014 12:55:08 +0000 http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=12386#comment-903 […] laws aren’t unconstitutional. I blame my buddy, Venkat Balasubramani for this, because he wrote a post about this interesting decision that included a portion that created confusion in some dicta in the opinion. And, well, […]

]]>