<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: In Its &#8220;Innocence of Muslims&#8221; Ruling, the Ninth Circuit is Guilty of Judicial Activism&#8211;Garcia v. Google	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2014/02/in-its-innocence-of-muslims-ruling-the-ninth-circuit-is-guilty-of-judicial-activism-garcia-v-google.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2014/02/in-its-innocence-of-muslims-ruling-the-ninth-circuit-is-guilty-of-judicial-activism-garcia-v-google.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:21:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: curtisneeley		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2014/02/in-its-innocence-of-muslims-ruling-the-ninth-circuit-is-guilty-of-judicial-activism-garcia-v-google.htm#comment-1250</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[curtisneeley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 05:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=11793#comment-1250</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The fundamental human right to exclusively control original speech is only protected by the Ninth Amendment and common law copy-right. The copy[rite] regime of 1790 protected no human right like was protected already in England. The United States [intentionally misspelled the copy[rite] book publishing monopolization ritual for two-hundred and twenty-four plus years The failure to recognize the common law copy-right early on was ignorant and will soon be corrected. The Title XVII regime has been an absurdly misspelled ritual since 1790. This Title XVII HOAX will soon be over.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fundamental human right to exclusively control original speech is only protected by the Ninth Amendment and common law copy-right. The copy[rite] regime of 1790 protected no human right like was protected already in England. The United States [intentionally misspelled the copy[rite] book publishing monopolization ritual for two-hundred and twenty-four plus years The failure to recognize the common law copy-right early on was ignorant and will soon be corrected. The Title XVII regime has been an absurdly misspelled ritual since 1790. This Title XVII HOAX will soon be over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: How The DMCA&#8217;s Online Copyright Safe Harbor Failed &#124; Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2014/02/in-its-innocence-of-muslims-ruling-the-ninth-circuit-is-guilty-of-judicial-activism-garcia-v-google.htm#comment-776</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[How The DMCA&#8217;s Online Copyright Safe Harbor Failed &#124; Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2014 18:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=11793#comment-776</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] content websites without ever sending them takedown notices at all; and in light of BS rulings like Garcia v. Google, the battle is now shifting towards requiring web hosts to ensure &#8220;stay-down,&#8221; not just [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] content websites without ever sending them takedown notices at all; and in light of BS rulings like Garcia v. Google, the battle is now shifting towards requiring web hosts to ensure &#8220;stay-down,&#8221; not just [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Want To Scrub Google Search Results In The US? Tough&#8211;O&#8217;Kroley v. Fastcase &#124; Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2014/02/in-its-innocence-of-muslims-ruling-the-ninth-circuit-is-guilty-of-judicial-activism-garcia-v-google.htm#comment-775</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Want To Scrub Google Search Results In The US? Tough&#8211;O&#8217;Kroley v. Fastcase &#124; Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 20:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=11793#comment-775</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] In Its “Innocence of Muslims” Ruling, the Ninth Circuit is Guilty of Judicial Activism–Garcia &#8230; * California’s New ‘Online Eraser’ Law Should Be Erased * When Should Search Engines Ignore [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] In Its “Innocence of Muslims” Ruling, the Ninth Circuit is Guilty of Judicial Activism–Garcia &#8230; * California’s New ‘Online Eraser’ Law Should Be Erased * When Should Search Engines Ignore [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Fair Use Protects Video Republication To Demonstrate Speaker&#8217;s Inconsistent Statements&#8211;Caner v. Autry &#124; Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2014/02/in-its-innocence-of-muslims-ruling-the-ninth-circuit-is-guilty-of-judicial-activism-garcia-v-google.htm#comment-774</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fair Use Protects Video Republication To Demonstrate Speaker&#8217;s Inconsistent Statements&#8211;Caner v. Autry &#124; Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 21:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=11793#comment-774</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] of the presentation entitled him to be a copyright owner. Perhaps, inspired by Garcia, he sought to assert a broader-than-usual copyright [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] of the presentation entitled him to be a copyright owner. Perhaps, inspired by Garcia, he sought to assert a broader-than-usual copyright [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Another Attempt to Scrub Unflattering Posts Fails &#124; Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2014/02/in-its-innocence-of-muslims-ruling-the-ninth-circuit-is-guilty-of-judicial-activism-garcia-v-google.htm#comment-773</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Another Attempt to Scrub Unflattering Posts Fails &#124; Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2014 23:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=11793#comment-773</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] set of claims, including the use of copyright claims as a mechanism to effect a takedown. (See Garcia v. Google and others.) Unfortunately for plaintiffs, the court is not having [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] set of claims, including the use of copyright claims as a mechanism to effect a takedown. (See Garcia v. Google and others.) Unfortunately for plaintiffs, the court is not having [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Another Questionable IP Lawsuit Over a Derogatory Twitter Account &#124; Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2014/02/in-its-innocence-of-muslims-ruling-the-ninth-circuit-is-guilty-of-judicial-activism-garcia-v-google.htm#comment-772</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Another Questionable IP Lawsuit Over a Derogatory Twitter Account &#124; Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 00:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=11793#comment-772</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] tries to fit all manner of claims to the conduct in question (including a copyright claim, see Garcia v. Google), but some are obviously not meritorious and others face numerous [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] tries to fit all manner of claims to the conduct in question (including a copyright claim, see Garcia v. Google), but some are obviously not meritorious and others face numerous [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Internet Law Professors File Amicus Brief in &#8216;Innocence of Muslims&#8217; Case&#8211;Garcia v. Google &#124; Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2014/02/in-its-innocence-of-muslims-ruling-the-ninth-circuit-is-guilty-of-judicial-activism-garcia-v-google.htm#comment-771</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Internet Law Professors File Amicus Brief in &#8216;Innocence of Muslims&#8217; Case&#8211;Garcia v. Google &#124; Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 16:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=11793#comment-771</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] sure you are familiar with Garcia v. Google, the copyright lawsuit against YouTube over the Innocence of Muslims video that led to a fatwa [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] sure you are familiar with Garcia v. Google, the copyright lawsuit against YouTube over the Innocence of Muslims video that led to a fatwa [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Xcentric Ventures Chips Away at Small Justice’s Copyright Workaround to Section 230 &#124; Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2014/02/in-its-innocence-of-muslims-ruling-the-ninth-circuit-is-guilty-of-judicial-activism-garcia-v-google.htm#comment-770</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xcentric Ventures Chips Away at Small Justice’s Copyright Workaround to Section 230 &#124; Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 18:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=11793#comment-770</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] shows how overreadings of copyright law can do violence to Section 230&#8242;s immunity (see the Garcia v. Google case as another flagship example). Assuming Ripoff Report eventually wins this case&#8211;which Venkat [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] shows how overreadings of copyright law can do violence to Section 230&#8242;s immunity (see the Garcia v. Google case as another flagship example). Assuming Ripoff Report eventually wins this case&#8211;which Venkat [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Court Spoils “Banana Lady&#8217;s” Appeal Over Online Recordings of Her Act &#124; Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2014/02/in-its-innocence-of-muslims-ruling-the-ninth-circuit-is-guilty-of-judicial-activism-garcia-v-google.htm#comment-769</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Court Spoils “Banana Lady&#8217;s” Appeal Over Online Recordings of Her Act &#124; Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=11793#comment-769</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] case also brings to mind the Ninth Circuit&#8217;s awful Garcia v. Google ruling. Here, the Banana Lady didn&#8217;t use copyright very effectively. She did ultimately take [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] case also brings to mind the Ninth Circuit&#8217;s awful Garcia v. Google ruling. Here, the Banana Lady didn&#8217;t use copyright very effectively. She did ultimately take [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Garcia v. Google: 9th Circuit Tells YouTube To Take Down Film That Sparked a Fatwa &#124; Take283		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2014/02/in-its-innocence-of-muslims-ruling-the-ninth-circuit-is-guilty-of-judicial-activism-garcia-v-google.htm#comment-768</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garcia v. Google: 9th Circuit Tells YouTube To Take Down Film That Sparked a Fatwa &#124; Take283]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 21:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=11793#comment-768</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] commentators have expressed, um, displeasure with the panel&#8217;s ruling.  See here, here, here, and [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] commentators have expressed, um, displeasure with the panel&#8217;s ruling.  See here, here, here, and [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
