<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Court Declines to Review LRO to [.delmonte], Saying gTLDs Aren&#8217;t &#8216;Domain Names&#8217; for Cybersquatting Purposes	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2014/02/court-declines-to-review-lro-to-saying-gtlds-arent-domain-names-for-cybersquatting-purposes.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2014/02/court-declines-to-review-lro-to-saying-gtlds-arent-domain-names-for-cybersquatting-purposes.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 12:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Martin Hoggard		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2014/02/court-declines-to-review-lro-to-saying-gtlds-arent-domain-names-for-cybersquatting-purposes.htm#comment-743</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Hoggard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 12:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=11705#comment-743</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think it is a good decision from the court and a good precedent too.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is a good decision from the court and a good precedent too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
