<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: SPEECH Act Defendant Gets $48,000 In Attorneys&#8217; Fees&#8211;Trout Point Lodge Ltd. v. Handshoe	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2013/12/speech-act-defendant-gets-48000-in-attorneys-fees-trout-point-lodge-ltd-v-handshoe.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2013/12/speech-act-defendant-gets-48000-in-attorneys-fees-trout-point-lodge-ltd-v-handshoe.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 19:46:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: 9th Circuit Issues a Blogger-Friendly First Amendment Opinion&#8211;Obsidian Finance v. Cox &#124; Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2013/12/speech-act-defendant-gets-48000-in-attorneys-fees-trout-point-lodge-ltd-v-handshoe.htm#comment-702</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[9th Circuit Issues a Blogger-Friendly First Amendment Opinion&#8211;Obsidian Finance v. Cox &#124; Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 19:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=11386#comment-702</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] SPEECH Act Defendant Gets $48,000 In Attorneys’ Fees–Trout Point Lodge Ltd. v. Handshoe [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] SPEECH Act Defendant Gets $48,000 In Attorneys’ Fees–Trout Point Lodge Ltd. v. Handshoe [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
