<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Revenge Porn Plot Leads To Criminal Conviction&#8211;New York v. Piznarski (Forbes Cross-Post)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2013/12/revenge-porn-plot-leads-to-criminal-conviction-new-york-v-piznarski-forbes-cross-post.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2013/12/revenge-porn-plot-leads-to-criminal-conviction-new-york-v-piznarski-forbes-cross-post.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2014 18:46:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Revenge Porn Prosecution Stumbles In New York &#124; Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2013/12/revenge-porn-plot-leads-to-criminal-conviction-new-york-v-piznarski-forbes-cross-post.htm#comment-701</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Revenge Porn Prosecution Stumbles In New York &#124; Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2014 18:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=11384#comment-701</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] The court says the detective’s statement is bereft of any facts that address how the underlying image was obtained so it’s facially insufficient. (For a possibly viable use of the surreptitious recording statute in the context of revenge porn, see Eric&#8217;s post on the Piznarski case: &#8220;Revenge Porn Plot Leads To Criminal Conviction–New York v. Piznarski&#8220;.) [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The court says the detective’s statement is bereft of any facts that address how the underlying image was obtained so it’s facially insufficient. (For a possibly viable use of the surreptitious recording statute in the context of revenge porn, see Eric&#8217;s post on the Piznarski case: &#8220;Revenge Porn Plot Leads To Criminal Conviction–New York v. Piznarski&#8220;.) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
