<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Privacy Plaintiffs Lose Because They Didn&#8217;t Rely on Apple&#8217;s Privacy Representations &#8212; In re iPhone App Litigation	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2013/12/privacy-plaintiffs-lose-because-they-didnt-rely-on-apples-privacy-representations-in-re-iphone-app-litigation.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2013/12/privacy-plaintiffs-lose-because-they-didnt-rely-on-apples-privacy-representations-in-re-iphone-app-litigation.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2014 18:11:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Android and Pandora Privacy Rulings Accept Low Hurdle for Standing &#124; Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2013/12/privacy-plaintiffs-lose-because-they-didnt-rely-on-apples-privacy-representations-in-re-iphone-app-litigation.htm#comment-675</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Android and Pandora Privacy Rulings Accept Low Hurdle for Standing &#124; Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2014 18:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=11246#comment-675</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] The court also cites to the recent ruling in a privacy lawsuit against Apple, which initially left some claims standing but ultimately dismissed those claims at the summary judgment stage. (See Privacy Plaintiffs Lose Because They Didn’t Rely on Apple’s Privacy Representations — In re iP&#8230;.) [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The court also cites to the recent ruling in a privacy lawsuit against Apple, which initially left some claims standing but ultimately dismissed those claims at the summary judgment stage. (See Privacy Plaintiffs Lose Because They Didn’t Rely on Apple’s Privacy Representations — In re iP&#8230;.) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Google Gets Dismissal of Lawsuit Over Privacy Policy Integration&#8211;In re Google Privacy Policy &#124; Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2013/12/privacy-plaintiffs-lose-because-they-didnt-rely-on-apples-privacy-representations-in-re-iphone-app-litigation.htm#comment-674</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Google Gets Dismissal of Lawsuit Over Privacy Policy Integration&#8211;In re Google Privacy Policy &#124; Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 18:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=11246#comment-674</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Judge Grewal was clearly aware of his chamber-mate Judge Koh&#8217;s opinion last week in In re iPhone Application Litigation because he cites it, but his opinion implicitly conflicts with her by finding Article III standing [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Judge Grewal was clearly aware of his chamber-mate Judge Koh&#8217;s opinion last week in In re iPhone Application Litigation because he cites it, but his opinion implicitly conflicts with her by finding Article III standing [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
