<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Previewing Lexmark vs Static Control, A Rare Supreme Court Case On False Advertising (Forbes Cross-Post)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2013/12/previewing-lexmark-vs-static-control-a-rare-supreme-court-case-on-false-advertising-forbes-cross-post.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2013/12/previewing-lexmark-vs-static-control-a-rare-supreme-court-case-on-false-advertising-forbes-cross-post.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2013 10:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Brian Lee		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2013/12/previewing-lexmark-vs-static-control-a-rare-supreme-court-case-on-false-advertising-forbes-cross-post.htm#comment-676</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2013 10:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=11277#comment-676</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[by the way, i love reading your book. this is  great nice read article. 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.joetorrilaw.com/north-tustin-child-custody-lawyer/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Law Office of Joe Torri - North Tustin Spousal Support Lawyer&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by the way, i love reading your book. this is  great nice read article. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.joetorrilaw.com/north-tustin-child-custody-lawyer/" rel="nofollow">Law Office of Joe Torri &#8211; North Tustin Spousal Support Lawyer</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
