<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Police Officer&#8217;s Facebook Venting Isn&#8217;t Protected By The First Amendment&#8211;Gresham v. Atlanta	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2013/10/police-officers-facebook-venting-isnt-protected-by-the-first-amendment-gresham-v-atlanta.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2013/10/police-officers-facebook-venting-isnt-protected-by-the-first-amendment-gresham-v-atlanta.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 21:26:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: First Amendment Protects but there are Consequences &#8211; John Jenkins (MMAJ 552) &#124; Laurie Miller Courses		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2013/10/police-officers-facebook-venting-isnt-protected-by-the-first-amendment-gresham-v-atlanta.htm#comment-595</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[First Amendment Protects but there are Consequences &#8211; John Jenkins (MMAJ 552) &#124; Laurie Miller Courses]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 21:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=10965#comment-595</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2013/10/police-officers-facebook-venting-isnt-protected-by-the-first-a&#8230; [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2013/10/police-officers-facebook-venting-isnt-protected-by-the-first-a&#8230; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Blawg Review 325.6 &#124; Popehat		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2013/10/police-officers-facebook-venting-isnt-protected-by-the-first-amendment-gresham-v-atlanta.htm#comment-594</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blawg Review 325.6 &#124; Popehat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2013 05:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=10965#comment-594</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] But complicated questions remain. For instance: is an entry on a Facebook account set to &#034;private&#034; public speech, or not? Also at the Technology &#038; Marketing Law Blog, Venkat Balasubramani discusses an Eleventh Circuit case in which a police officer was fired for criticizing fellow cops o&#8230; [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] But complicated questions remain. For instance: is an entry on a Facebook account set to &quot;private&quot; public speech, or not? Also at the Technology &amp; Marketing Law Blog, Venkat Balasubramani discusses an Eleventh Circuit case in which a police officer was fired for criticizing fellow cops o&#8230; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Josh King		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2013/10/police-officers-facebook-venting-isnt-protected-by-the-first-amendment-gresham-v-atlanta.htm#comment-593</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh King]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2013 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/?p=10965#comment-593</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great to see you&#039;re finally allowing comments!  And interesting point re public-v-private - I can&#039;t wait to see the NLRB&#039;s guidance on social media outbursts challenged in court.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great to see you&#8217;re finally allowing comments!  And interesting point re public-v-private &#8211; I can&#8217;t wait to see the NLRB&#8217;s guidance on social media outbursts challenged in court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
