<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: More Evidence That Competitive Keyword Advertising Benefits Trademark Owners (Forbes Cross-Post)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2013/08/more_evidence_t_2.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2013/08/more_evidence_t_2.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Jan 2014 16:01:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: The Debate Over ‘Competitive Keyword Advertising’ … All for Naught? - IPLJ		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2013/08/more_evidence_t_2.htm#comment-565</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Debate Over ‘Competitive Keyword Advertising’ … All for Naught? - IPLJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jan 2014 16:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2013/08/more_evidence_t_2.htm#comment-565</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] on a data set of 5.38 million website visits, they ultimately found that the policy change was a “non-event for searchers … [which] alone raises serious doubts about trademark owners’ concerns.” Further, the [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] on a data set of 5.38 million website visits, they ultimately found that the policy change was a “non-event for searchers … [which] alone raises serious doubts about trademark owners’ concerns.” Further, the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
