<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Rationalizing (?) the Hart and Keller v. EA Sports Publicity Rights Rulings (Guest Blog Post)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2013/08/a_futile_attemp.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2013/08/a_futile_attemp.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 21:02:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Top Ten Internet Law Developments Of 2013 (Forbes Cross-Post) &#124; Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2013/08/a_futile_attemp.htm#comment-564</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Top Ten Internet Law Developments Of 2013 (Forbes Cross-Post) &#124; Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 21:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2013/08/a_futile_attemp.htm#comment-564</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] in California), they survive Article III standing dismissal challenges, and as we saw from the EA Sports cases, they can be used to attack editorial content. Overall, a well-designed tool for litigation [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] in California), they survive Article III standing dismissal challenges, and as we saw from the EA Sports cases, they can be used to attack editorial content. Overall, a well-designed tool for litigation [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
