<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Revisiting the Ninth Circuit&#8217;s 1979 AMF v. Sleekcraft Case Post-Remand (Guest Blog Post)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2013/02/revisiting_the.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2013/02/revisiting_the.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2018 20:16:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Book Review: &#8220;The Little Book of Foodie Law&#8221; &#124; Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2013/02/revisiting_the.htm#comment-559</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Book Review: &#8220;The Little Book of Foodie Law&#8221; &#124; Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Oct 2013 21:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2013/02/revisiting_the.htm#comment-559</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] dissimilar to the blog posts we&#039;ve done recounting a case&#039;s history (see, e.g., Sruli&#039;s posts on Sleekcraft and DC v. RR), except IMO our blog posts are WAY better than these [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] dissimilar to the blog posts we&#039;ve done recounting a case&#039;s history (see, e.g., Sruli&#039;s posts on Sleekcraft and DC v. RR), except IMO our blog posts are WAY better than these [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
