<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Troubling Ruling About 47 USC 230 and Moderators&#8211;Cornelius v. DeLuca	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2010/05/troubling_rulin.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2010/05/troubling_rulin.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 10:48:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: The Law Developer		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2010/05/troubling_rulin.htm#comment-552</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Law Developer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 10:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2010/05/troubling_rulin.htm#comment-552</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Are You Threatening Me?&lt;/strong&gt;

&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;Eric Goldman at the Technology &#038; Marketing Blog writes about an interesting case involving Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and comment moderators. The case held that website owners are liable for the def...

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Are You Threatening Me?</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Eric Goldman at the Technology &#038; Marketing Blog writes about an interesting case involving Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and comment moderators. The case held that website owners are liable for the def&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
