<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Ninth Circuit Mucks Up 47 USC 230 Jurisprudence&#8230;.AGAIN!?&#8211;Barnes v. Yahoo	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2009/05/ninth_circuit_m.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2009/05/ninth_circuit_m.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 13:43:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Concurring Opinions		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2009/05/ninth_circuit_m.htm#comment-545</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Concurring Opinions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 13:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2009/05/ninth_circuit_m.htm#comment-545</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Barnes v. Yahoo!, CDA Immunity, and Promissory Estoppel&lt;/strong&gt;

The Ninth Circuit recently decided Barnes v. Yahoo!, a case with some very interesting holdings relating to the Communications Decency Act § 230 as well as promissory estoppel.  I wrote about this case briefly in my book, The Future of Reputation, lo...

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Barnes v. Yahoo!, CDA Immunity, and Promissory Estoppel</strong></p>
<p>The Ninth Circuit recently decided Barnes v. Yahoo!, a case with some very interesting holdings relating to the Communications Decency Act § 230 as well as promissory estoppel.  I wrote about this case briefly in my book, The Future of Reputation, lo&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
