<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8220;Junk Mail is Alive and Growing&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2006/12/junk_mail_is_al.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2006/12/junk_mail_is_al.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 21:35:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael Risch		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2006/12/junk_mail_is_al.htm#comment-500</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Risch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 21:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2006/12/junk_mail_is_al.htm#comment-500</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Related to (and perhaps subsumed by) your last three points is that enhancements in data collection made possible by modern networks probably allows for more targeted, and thus more profitable, direct mail.

Is there any data on increased response rates over time in general or for specific market segments?

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Related to (and perhaps subsumed by) your last three points is that enhancements in data collection made possible by modern networks probably allows for more targeted, and thus more profitable, direct mail.</p>
<p>Is there any data on increased response rates over time in general or for specific market segments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
