Comments on: Griper Gets 47 USC 230 Defense for Reposted Article–D’Alonzo v. Truscello https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2006/07/griper_gets_47.htm Mon, 31 Jul 2006 21:25:08 +0000 hourly 1 By: Eric Goldman https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2006/07/griper_gets_47.htm#comment-394 Mon, 31 Jul 2006 21:25:08 +0000 http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2006/07/griper_gets_47.htm#comment-394 Certainly the analysis would be very different under 17 USC 512! Eric.

]]> By: Michael Risch https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2006/07/griper_gets_47.htm#comment-393 Mon, 03 Jul 2006 23:28:27 +0000 http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2006/07/griper_gets_47.htm#comment-393 It seems like this holding defeats the intent of Section 230. Grabbing content and republishing it is not even close to the publication of end user content on a system. The act of choosing to republish someone else’s content makes the person the content provider, I would think.

]]>