Comments on: Google Sued for Child Porn–Toback v. Google https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2006/05/google_sued_for_1.htm Mon, 31 Jul 2006 21:42:07 +0000 hourly 1 By: Eric Goldman https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2006/05/google_sued_for_1.htm#comment-372 Mon, 31 Jul 2006 21:42:07 +0000 http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2006/05/google_sued_for_1.htm#comment-372 Let’s hope they are voting in digust! Eric.

]]> By: Matt https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2006/05/google_sued_for_1.htm#comment-371 Tue, 09 May 2006 13:44:21 +0000 http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2006/05/google_sued_for_1.htm#comment-371 I can’t believe what I just read!

It seems to me that it would be more of a police task force matter.

Completely frivolous. I can imagine his constituents must be shaking their heads with disbelief.

]]> By: David Nieporent https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2006/05/google_sued_for_1.htm#comment-370 Mon, 08 May 2006 21:51:02 +0000 http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2006/05/google_sued_for_1.htm#comment-370 Even commenting on the suit may be taking it more seriously than it deserves, but if we put that aside for the moment, the plaintiff apparently doesn’t realize that Google offers a filtering option, called SafeSearch.

If Mr. Toback is worried about his children “being exposed to inappropriate … material,” perhaps Mr. Toback should sue less and parent more, and try turning on SafeSearch.

]]>