<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Google Sued Over Rankings&#8211;KinderStart.com v. Google	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2006/03/google_sued_ove.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2006/03/google_sued_ove.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2015 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: mahmoud eltanahy		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2006/03/google_sued_ove.htm#comment-1215</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mahmoud eltanahy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2015 23:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2006/03/google_sued_ove.htm#comment-1215</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Fantastic , this article has helped me to understand some of the important points in the &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.blogger.com/blogin.g?blogspotURL=http://seo-true.blogspot.com/&#038;bpli=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ٍseo&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic , this article has helped me to understand some of the important points in the <a href="https://www.blogger.com/blogin.g?blogspotURL=http://seo-true.blogspot.com/&amp;bpli=1" rel="nofollow">ٍseo</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Pay Per Click Advertising		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2006/03/google_sued_ove.htm#comment-345</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pay Per Click Advertising]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 07:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2006/03/google_sued_ove.htm#comment-345</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If a website was manipulated in such a way that violated Google terms of use and its&#039; Pagerank, I&#039;m confident that Google has another system to manually penalized the website for its&#039; action.

Keep in mind that all softwares are created by a person or a group of people and there will be flaws. With this in mind, there has to be way to manually override certain automated functions such a Googlebot.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a website was manipulated in such a way that violated Google terms of use and its&#8217; Pagerank, I&#8217;m confident that Google has another system to manually penalized the website for its&#8217; action.</p>
<p>Keep in mind that all softwares are created by a person or a group of people and there will be flaws. With this in mind, there has to be way to manually override certain automated functions such a Googlebot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Marcello		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2006/03/google_sued_ove.htm#comment-344</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marcello]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 11:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2006/03/google_sued_ove.htm#comment-344</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Eric, regarding kinderstart.com vs Google, what is your take on Google help desk&#039;s claim that updates are completely automated and yet they specifically ask you to manually report &quot;spammy&quot; sites.  Doesn&#039;t Google run the risk of having a disgruntled employee who may come forward and dispute this assumed Google algo &quot;purity&quot;?

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric, regarding kinderstart.com vs Google, what is your take on Google help desk&#8217;s claim that updates are completely automated and yet they specifically ask you to manually report &#8220;spammy&#8221; sites.  Doesn&#8217;t Google run the risk of having a disgruntled employee who may come forward and dispute this assumed Google algo &#8220;purity&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John Rodkin		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2006/03/google_sued_ove.htm#comment-343</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Rodkin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 01:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2006/03/google_sued_ove.htm#comment-343</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for pointing out the complaint on your blog, Eric (or for posting it, if it wasn&#039;t you who pointed it out).

I completely agree with your assessment.  I think if the 17200 claim is argued well, it will get through summary judgment but still lose (at least mostly) eventually.  But I&#039;m not an expert on any of this.

(Nice to run into another JD/MBA who spent time at Cooley!)

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing out the complaint on your blog, Eric (or for posting it, if it wasn&#8217;t you who pointed it out).</p>
<p>I completely agree with your assessment.  I think if the 17200 claim is argued well, it will get through summary judgment but still lose (at least mostly) eventually.  But I&#8217;m not an expert on any of this.</p>
<p>(Nice to run into another JD/MBA who spent time at Cooley!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
