<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Google Launches Affiliate Programs	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2005/11/google_launches.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2005/11/google_launches.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2005 14:47:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: observer		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2005/11/google_launches.htm#comment-275</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[observer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2005 14:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2005/11/google_launches.htm#comment-275</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yup.  Grabbing up desktop real estate while the brand continues to have momentum.  It&#039;s a long-term play, I&#039;m guessing, designed at broadening the user base and providing less opportunity for Google users to use other search options.

Plus, like it or not, advertising supported software &amp; features are going to become more and more commonplace.  I&#039;d bet real money that there&#039;s a behavioral tracking component to the toolbar that will come into play eventually.

Ob

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup.  Grabbing up desktop real estate while the brand continues to have momentum.  It&#8217;s a long-term play, I&#8217;m guessing, designed at broadening the user base and providing less opportunity for Google users to use other search options.</p>
<p>Plus, like it or not, advertising supported software &#038; features are going to become more and more commonplace.  I&#8217;d bet real money that there&#8217;s a behavioral tracking component to the toolbar that will come into play eventually.</p>
<p>Ob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John Feeney		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2005/11/google_launches.htm#comment-274</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Feeney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 17:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2005/11/google_launches.htm#comment-274</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Welcome too the big boys.  The tool bar serves one purpose &quot;BRANDING&quot;.  Web-ops is the future like it or not. Affiliate links provide &quot;one&quot; direction for credit.  Even in my business, they click-thru my site, bookmark the info, return later.  No credit of sale is recorded.

MS &amp; Google are the modern day:

McDonalds and Burger King - let everyone else fight over 3rd place.

Yahoo backed away from AOL (AOL knows its future), Yahoo business model today is buying market-share or they will be left behind.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome too the big boys.  The tool bar serves one purpose &#8220;BRANDING&#8221;.  Web-ops is the future like it or not. Affiliate links provide &#8220;one&#8221; direction for credit.  Even in my business, they click-thru my site, bookmark the info, return later.  No credit of sale is recorded.</p>
<p>MS &#038; Google are the modern day:</p>
<p>McDonalds and Burger King &#8211; let everyone else fight over 3rd place.</p>
<p>Yahoo backed away from AOL (AOL knows its future), Yahoo business model today is buying market-share or they will be left behind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sarah		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2005/11/google_launches.htm#comment-273</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2005/11/google_launches.htm#comment-273</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[But the Adsense stuff wasn&#039;t the BIG announcement for Wednesday. Breaking news on my website! ;)

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the Adsense stuff wasn&#8217;t the BIG announcement for Wednesday. Breaking news on my website! 😉</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jmood		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2005/11/google_launches.htm#comment-272</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jmood]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 13:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2005/11/google_launches.htm#comment-272</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Google Toolbar is valuable for two reasons: first, its continuous presence on the desktop means Google owns a piece of that valuable real estate (~2.7% of my screen as I measure it), and second, its continuous presence means it&#039;s easier to run searches at any time without having to navigate to a new page. Google&#039;s Toolbar has been around long enough that I&#039;d guess their search volume would drop dramatically if it disappeared tomorrow. Not a good thing for their business.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Google Toolbar is valuable for two reasons: first, its continuous presence on the desktop means Google owns a piece of that valuable real estate (~2.7% of my screen as I measure it), and second, its continuous presence means it&#8217;s easier to run searches at any time without having to navigate to a new page. Google&#8217;s Toolbar has been around long enough that I&#8217;d guess their search volume would drop dramatically if it disappeared tomorrow. Not a good thing for their business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Matthew Goeden		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2005/11/google_launches.htm#comment-271</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Goeden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 08:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2005/11/google_launches.htm#comment-271</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[dang it.  My neat html &quot;strike&quot; tags got cleansed from my comment.  The last sentence reads, &quot;The investors lose; the STRIKEjournalistsENDSTRIKE bloggers win.&quot;

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dang it.  My neat html &#8220;strike&#8221; tags got cleansed from my comment.  The last sentence reads, &#8220;The investors lose; the STRIKEjournalistsENDSTRIKE bloggers win.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Matthew Goeden		</title>
		<link>https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2005/11/google_launches.htm#comment-270</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Goeden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 08:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2005/11/google_launches.htm#comment-270</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I agree with all of you comments.

I, too, am a little confused as to the purpose of promoting the Google toolbar.  I have a couple theories as to the purpose of the promotion:

(1)  This is nothing but an effort to increase Firefox&#039;s market share (the toolbar is just a gimic) to fight Microsoft.

btw -- I am not sure how the toolbar gets installed since clicking on the ad briefly sends you to an obscure Google site and then directly on the Firefox&#039;s site.  So, what if the person installs Firefox after clicking on your ad, but not the Google toolbar?  I will investigate....

(2)  Google is just trying to pre-empt Microsoft.  Microsoft&#039;s next version of Internet Explorer is probably going to blow most people away;  Google is just trying to pre-empt M$&#039;s new features (steal their thunder) (one has to wonder if Google planted the web rumor a couple weeks ago about creating a web-based version of OpenOffice simply to pre-empt Microsoft&#039;s announcement of their web-based products).

I think Microsoft&#039;s annoucement of creating web-based versions of all their apps has Google a little scared.  Web-based Outlook is probably used by 90% of the students at Marquette (which blows my mind because I think web-based Outlook sucks big time), which shows how ready people are to embracing web-based fully-featured applications, like Word.

(3)  Google doesn&#039;t care about its investors.... ;)  Hippy, open-source evangelists are tainting their business.  (hmm, where can I stick somebody about Google fighting Microsoft in this point....)

In brief, the business model is definitely not clear to me.  If I were a Google stock holder, I would be complaining.  Until the proverbial &quot;next big thing&quot; happens, Microsoft and Google will be taking &quot;pot shots&quot; at each other, which probably will have little-to-no effect on each other.  The investors lose; the journalists bloggers win.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with all of you comments.</p>
<p>I, too, am a little confused as to the purpose of promoting the Google toolbar.  I have a couple theories as to the purpose of the promotion:</p>
<p>(1)  This is nothing but an effort to increase Firefox&#8217;s market share (the toolbar is just a gimic) to fight Microsoft.</p>
<p>btw &#8212; I am not sure how the toolbar gets installed since clicking on the ad briefly sends you to an obscure Google site and then directly on the Firefox&#8217;s site.  So, what if the person installs Firefox after clicking on your ad, but not the Google toolbar?  I will investigate&#8230;.</p>
<p>(2)  Google is just trying to pre-empt Microsoft.  Microsoft&#8217;s next version of Internet Explorer is probably going to blow most people away;  Google is just trying to pre-empt M$&#8217;s new features (steal their thunder) (one has to wonder if Google planted the web rumor a couple weeks ago about creating a web-based version of OpenOffice simply to pre-empt Microsoft&#8217;s announcement of their web-based products).</p>
<p>I think Microsoft&#8217;s annoucement of creating web-based versions of all their apps has Google a little scared.  Web-based Outlook is probably used by 90% of the students at Marquette (which blows my mind because I think web-based Outlook sucks big time), which shows how ready people are to embracing web-based fully-featured applications, like Word.</p>
<p>(3)  Google doesn&#8217;t care about its investors&#8230;. 😉  Hippy, open-source evangelists are tainting their business.  (hmm, where can I stick somebody about Google fighting Microsoft in this point&#8230;.)</p>
<p>In brief, the business model is definitely not clear to me.  If I were a Google stock holder, I would be complaining.  Until the proverbial &#8220;next big thing&#8221; happens, Microsoft and Google will be taking &#8220;pot shots&#8221; at each other, which probably will have little-to-no effect on each other.  The investors lose; the journalists bloggers win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
