« August 2011 | Main | November 2011 »
October 29, 2011
Bloggers' Sunshine Requests Get Less Respect Than Newspapers'--Paff v. Chatham
Paff v. Chatham, 2011 WL 5105477 (N.J. Super. A.D. Oct. 28, 2011)
A blogger asked the city how long it suspended a rogue police officer. The city refused the blogger's sunshine request. The court did too, saying as part of its multi-factor analysis:
The threshold consideration under the common law right to access is whether the plaintiff has standing. Newspapers are afforded standing as entities that collectively represent the public interest. See Home News v. State Dep't of Health, 144 N.J. 446, 454 (1996) (“The press's role as ‘the eyes and ears of the public’ generally is sufficient to confer standing on a newspaper that seeks access to public documents.”). Both parties agree that Paff's sporadic blogging activity does not qualify him as a journalist. See Too Much Media, LLC v. Hale, 206 N.J. 209, 237 (2011). Thus, his interest in the subject matter at issue is not that of a news source. [some cites omitted]
It's hard to stand up for the blogger if he gives up the issue himself. But even a sporadic blogger can act as "the eyes and ears of the public," especially a niche watchdog blog like "NJ Public Employee Discipline Appeals." Then again, given the troubling Hale precedent, maybe the New Jersey courts have just decided to privilege newspapers over bloggers. It would be great if courts like this explicitly acknowledged that they're making a silly and incoherent choice.
Posted by Eric at 07:47 AM | Blogosphere Issues | TrackBack
October 02, 2011
Facebook Entries Negate Car Crash Victims' Physical Injury Claims
On the ever-popular subject of social media posts that belie the statements litigants make in court, consider Boudwin v. General Ins. Co. of America, 2011 WL 4433578 (La. App. Ct. Sept. 14, 2011). The litigation is the result of a serious car accident, and two of the injured victims (Jessi and Lee) believed the insurance company shorted them. In a jury trial, the jury didn't award anything to the litigants for loss of enjoyment of life or physical disability. The court recounts the situation:
At trial, both Jessi and Lee were specifically asked about how their lives had changed following the accident, and both of them gave very similar responses. Jessi, who at the time of the accident had just graduated from high school, testified that before the accident, she studied all the time. Following the accident, she stated she still studied, but it was painful. She said the only thing she could not do following the accident was sit ups and study for long periods of time. At the time of trial, Jessi was a senior at Nicholls State University maintaining a 4.0 grade point average.
Jessi was also questioned regarding some of her routine physical activities, especially in regard to entries she made on her Facebook page. She acknowledged that she runs, or rather jogs, regularly to stay in shape, and even attempted to do an exercise program called P9OX with a friend, which she described as being “really tough.”...
Lee likewise testified that his lifestyle before and after the accident were pretty much the same. He still participated in all the same activities and maintained his military commitment, including successfully completing physical aptitude tests required by the Army twice a year. Still, Lee testified that before the accident, he always stayed active and played a lot of sports, and following the accident, while he continued to stay active, it was “not as much, because I find that after activity that it's a lot more pain than usual.”
On cross examination, however, Lee acknowledged several entries from his Facebook page where he reported frequently “working out” and also playing sports such as basketball, tennis, “ultimate Frisbee,” and softball, sometimes engaging in multiple sessions of sporting activities in a single day. He further acknowledged that he wrote on his Facebook page that he had participated in a softball tournament in the month before trial, which happened to be two days before his final visit with. Dr. Cenac. When asked if he had informed Dr. Cenac of any of injuries he had sustained while playing sports, he stated that he told Dr. Cenac that he stayed “active,” but that he was “not inclined” to tell Dr. Cenac that he was playing on softball teams.
Considering the testimony and medical evidence presented, we cannot say that the jury was manifestly erroneous in refusing to award any damages for physical disability or loss of enjoyment of life. The record clearly shows that neither Jessi nor Lee have experienced any significant limitations or impairments as a result of the injuries they sustained in the May 31, 2008 accident.
More examples in this line of cases:
* Contrary MySpace Evidence Strikes a Litigant Again--HAC, Inc. v. Box
* MySpace Postings Foil Another Litigant--Sedie v. U.S.
* Disturbingly Humorous MySpace Posts Used as Impeaching Evidence in Spousal Abuse Case--Embry v. State
* Latest Example of Social Networking Site Evidence Contradicting In-Court Testimony--People v. Franco
Posted by Eric at 09:45 PM | Blogosphere Issues , Legal Industry | TrackBack
October 01, 2011
Favorite Photos of the Past 3 Years
Lisa and I have posted over 400 photos to Flickr over the past 3 years. See goldmanlisa, Eric Goldman Mountain View and my newest account. I've gone back through them and selected some of my favorites.
Family
* Me in front of the Peter & Paul Fortress in St. Petersburg, Russia (2011) [this is my current online avatar at most sites--thanks to Oliver Metzger for taking this photo]
* Dina and Binoculars (2010) [there is something about this photo that cracks me up every time I see it]
* Dina with her new Pillow Pet (2010)
* Jacob at the Sonoma Coast beach (2010) [this has been my computer wallpaper since I took it]
* Jacob kayaking (2010)
* Dina the Flower Girl (2009)
* Dina and Daddy at Craig and Sarah's wedding (2009) [this was my Facebook avatar for a couple years]
Travel
* Sunset from East Bay Campground on Angel Island (2011)
* Vernal Falls and Dina's drawing of it (2011)
* Erasmusbrug, Rotterdam (2010)
* Erasmusbrug, Rotterdam (2010)
Other
* Slinky collection #1 and #2 (2011)
* Vegan Banana Split Cupcakes (2008) [these tasted as good as they look]
* Slinky Cake for my 40th birthday (2008)
Posted by Eric at 09:14 PM | Family & Friends , Travel | TrackBack